Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TÜV AUSTRIA  iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie)TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie)
VS
DNVDNV
TÜV AUSTRIA  iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie)

TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie)

Deutschstraße 10, None, Vienna, None, AT, 1230

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile

Der größte und leistungsstärkste industrielle Computertomograph (iCT) in Österreich ermöglicht mithilfe von Röntgenstrahlung die Darstellung von Außen-Geometrien sowie Innen-Strukturen und Fehlern von Objekten. Wir liefern Ihnen spannende Einblicke in die vielseitigen M...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
DNV

DNV

Veritasveien 1, Høvik, Oslo, NO, 1322

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.dnv.com
748/1000Moderate

DNV is the independent expert in risk management and assurance, operating in more than 100 countries. Through its broad experience and deep expertise DNV advances safety and sustainable performance, sets industry benchmarks, and inspires and invents solutions. Whether...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:22,475
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TÜV AUSTRIA  iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie)

TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DNV

DNV

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DNV in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DNV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DNV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TÜV AUSTRIA  iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie)

TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
DNV

DNV

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DNV905092125

FAQ

Between TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) company and DNV company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) company and DNV company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) company and DNV company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) company and DNV company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) company and DNV company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) company and DNV company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) company and DNV company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) company and DNV company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) company and DNV company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) company and DNV company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) company and DNV company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) and DNV, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) and DNV, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) or DNV ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) or DNV ?
Between TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) and DNV, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TÜV AUSTRIA iCT (Industrielle Computertomographie) and DNV, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9