Comparison Overview
Sytel Reply

Sytel Reply
160 Victoria Street, London, England, undefined, GB
Last Update: 20/12/2025
Sytel Reply is the Reply Company focused on Networks and Security. With an agile and collaborative approach we partner with our clients to ensure their network ecosystem is ready to exploit the opportunities of Digitalisation, IOT and Cloud by harnessing the power of A...

Engineering Group
Piazzale dell'agricoltura, 24, Roma, Lazio, IT, 00144
Last Update: 08/09/2026
Engineering Group is the Digital Transformation Company, leader in Italy and expanding its global footprint, with around 14,000 associates and with over 80 offices spread across Europe, the United States, and South America and global delivery. The Engineering Group, c...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Sytel Reply







Engineering Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sytel Reply in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Engineering Group in 2026.
Incident History - Sytel Reply (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sytel Reply cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Engineering Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Engineering Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Sytel Reply

Engineering Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.
IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.
IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.