Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SystemSpecs GroupSystemSpecs Group
VS
AtosAtos
SystemSpecs Group

SystemSpecs Group

Plot B22 Chief Yesufu Abiodun Oniru Road, Oniru, 23401, NG

Last Update: 11/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://systemspecs.com.ng/
662/1000Weak

SystemSpecs Holdings Limited (SHL) is a foremost financial technology and human resources solutions provider, as well as the mother brand of Remita Payment Services Limited (RPSL), HumanManager Limited, and SystemSpecs Technology Services Limited (STSL). Established i...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:263
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Atos

Atos

80 Quai Voltaire, 95877 Bezons, FR

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.atos.net
753/1000Fair

Atos Group is a global leader in digital transformation with c. 67,000 employees and annual revenue of c. €10 billion, operating in 61 countries under two brands — Atos for services and Eviden for products. European number one in cybersecurity, cloud and high performanc...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:87,005
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SystemSpecs Group

SystemSpecs Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Atos

Atos

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

SystemSpecs Group has 33.33% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atos in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SystemSpecs Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SystemSpecs Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Atos (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atos cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SystemSpecs Group

SystemSpecs Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
STESYSORA1775910702
Atos

Atos

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SystemSpecs Group company and Atos company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SystemSpecs Group company and Atos company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SystemSpecs Group company and Atos company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SystemSpecs Group company and Atos company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SystemSpecs Group company and Atos company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SystemSpecs Group company and Atos company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SystemSpecs Group company and Atos company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SystemSpecs Group company and Atos company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SystemSpecs Group company and Atos company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SystemSpecs Group company and Atos company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SystemSpecs Group company and Atos company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SystemSpecs Group and Atos, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SystemSpecs Group and Atos, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SystemSpecs Group or Atos ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SystemSpecs Group or Atos ?
Between SystemSpecs Group and Atos, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SystemSpecs Group and Atos, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES