Comparison Overview
Sysmex America, Inc.

Sysmex America, Inc.
577 Aptakisic Road, Lincolnshire, 60069, US
Last Update: 30/03/2026
Sysmex America, Inc. distributes and supports automated in vitro diagnostic hematology, flow cytometry, technology solutions, coagulation and urinalysis analyzers, reagents and information systems for laboratories and healthcare facilities in the Americas. We are headqu...

Smith+Nephew
5 Hatters Lane, Watford, Hertfordshire, GB, WD18 8YE
Last Update: 12/09/2026
Smith+Nephew is a global medical technology company. We design and manufacture technology that takes the limits off living. We support healthcare professionals to return their patients to health and mobility, helping them to perform at their fullest potential. From our...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Sysmex America, Inc.







Smith+Nephew






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sysmex America, Inc. in 2026.
Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Smith+Nephew in 2026.
Incident History - Sysmex America, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sysmex America, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Smith+Nephew (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Smith+Nephew cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Sysmex America, Inc.

Smith+Nephew
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.