Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sysco International Food Group (IFG)Sysco International Food Group (IFG)
VS
Arca ContinentalArca Continental
Sysco International Food Group (IFG)

Sysco International Food Group (IFG)

2401 Police Center Dr, #240, Plant City, Florida, US, 33566

Last Update: 16/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://sysco.com/ifg
762/1000Fair

As Sysco's export specialty division, IFG delivers expertise in product selection, specialized services and supply chain capabilities to customers in over 80 countries around the world. Every day, the team supports our independent distributor partners and US-based rest...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:109
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Arca Continental

Arca Continental

Av. San Jerónimo 813 Pte, Monterrey, 64640, MX

Last Update: 06/07/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.arcacontal.com/
796/1000Fair

Arca Continental produces, distributes and sells non-alcoholic beverages under The Coca-Cola Company brand, as well as snacks under the brands of Bokados in Mexico, Inalecsa in Ecuador and Wise in the US. With an outstanding history spanning more than 98 years, Arca Co...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:15,509
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sysco International Food Group (IFG)

Sysco International Food Group (IFG)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Arca Continental

Arca Continental

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sysco International Food Group (IFG) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arca Continental in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sysco International Food Group (IFG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sysco International Food Group (IFG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Arca Continental (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arca Continental cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sysco International Food Group (IFG)

Sysco International Food Group (IFG)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Arca Continental

Arca Continental

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
RYUARC1776788790

FAQ

Between Sysco International Food Group (IFG) company and Arca Continental company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sysco International Food Group (IFG) company and Arca Continental company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sysco International Food Group (IFG) company and Arca Continental company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sysco International Food Group (IFG) company and Arca Continental company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sysco International Food Group (IFG) company and Arca Continental company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sysco International Food Group (IFG) company and Arca Continental company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sysco International Food Group (IFG) company and Arca Continental company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sysco International Food Group (IFG) company and Arca Continental company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sysco International Food Group (IFG) company and Arca Continental company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sysco International Food Group (IFG) company and Arca Continental company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sysco International Food Group (IFG) company and Arca Continental company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sysco International Food Group (IFG) and Arca Continental, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sysco International Food Group (IFG) and Arca Continental, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sysco International Food Group (IFG) or Arca Continental ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sysco International Food Group (IFG) or Arca Continental ?
Between Sysco International Food Group (IFG) and Arca Continental, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sysco International Food Group (IFG) and Arca Continental, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2