Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

General Atomics Synopta GmbHGeneral Atomics Synopta GmbH
VS
Pratt & WhitneyPratt & Whitney
General Atomics Synopta GmbH

General Atomics Synopta GmbH

Sonderstrasse 7, Eggersriet, 9034, CH

Last Update: 25/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://ga-synopta.ch/
744/1000Moderate

General Atomics Synopta GmbH, Eggersriet (CH), is a Swiss company that is specialized in the design and production of high data rate laser communication systems and associated equipment for space and ground-based applications. Furthermore, GA Synopta produces optical/me...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:11
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Pratt & Whitney

Pratt & Whitney

400 Main Street, East Hartford, CT, US, 06108

Last Update: 03/09/2026

View Profile
778/1000Fair

Pratt & Whitney, an RTX business, is a global leader in propulsion systems, powering the most advanced aircraft in the world, and we are shaping the future of aviation. Our engines help connect people, grow economies and defend freedom. Our customers depend on us to get...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:29,731
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
General Atomics Synopta GmbH

General Atomics Synopta GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Pratt & Whitney

Pratt & Whitney

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for General Atomics Synopta GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pratt & Whitney in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - General Atomics Synopta GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Atomics Synopta GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Pratt & Whitney (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pratt & Whitney cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
General Atomics Synopta GmbH

General Atomics Synopta GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Pratt & Whitney

Pratt & Whitney

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRA133082125

FAQ

Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH and Pratt & Whitney, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH and Pratt & Whitney, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - General Atomics Synopta GmbH or Pratt & Whitney ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - General Atomics Synopta GmbH or Pratt & Whitney ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH and Pratt & Whitney, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH and Pratt & Whitney, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA