Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SYNLAB Medical Digital ServicesSYNLAB Medical Digital Services
VS
VMwareVMware
SYNLAB Medical Digital Services

SYNLAB Medical Digital Services

Odeons Kvarter 19, 2.tv., Odense C, Syddanmark, DK, 5000

Last Update: 22/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.smds.dk/
751/1000Fair

SYNLAB Medical Digital Services har specialiseret sig i internationale IT-løsninger og infrastruktur, som anvendes af alle sundhedsvæsenets parter. Vi har mere end 15 års erfaring og unik viden om sundhedsvæsenets mange parter, de mange interesseorganisationer og talrig...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:27
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
VMware

VMware

3401 Hillview Ave, Palo Alto, 94304, US

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
197/1000Critical

Broadcom's VMware software manages cloud complexity so customers can modernize infrastructure, accelerate app development, and protect workloads, wherever these reside. Our flagship cloud solutions provide the security and performance of private cloud combined with the...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:11,107
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
12
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SYNLAB Medical Digital Services

SYNLAB Medical Digital Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
VMware

VMware

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SYNLAB Medical Digital Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

VMware has 1065.05% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - SYNLAB Medical Digital Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SYNLAB Medical Digital Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - VMware (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VMware cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SYNLAB Medical Digital Services

SYNLAB Medical Digital Services

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
VMware

VMware

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ADO1788668623
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
EURVMW1788092657
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MCDCITSHEVODVERATTGITCURAUSVMW1787509645

FAQ

Between SYNLAB Medical Digital Services company and VMware company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SYNLAB Medical Digital Services company and VMware company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SYNLAB Medical Digital Services company and VMware company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SYNLAB Medical Digital Services company and VMware company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SYNLAB Medical Digital Services company and VMware company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SYNLAB Medical Digital Services company and VMware company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SYNLAB Medical Digital Services company and VMware company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SYNLAB Medical Digital Services company and VMware company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SYNLAB Medical Digital Services company and VMware company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SYNLAB Medical Digital Services company and VMware company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SYNLAB Medical Digital Services company and VMware company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SYNLAB Medical Digital Services and VMware, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SYNLAB Medical Digital Services and VMware, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SYNLAB Medical Digital Services or VMware ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SYNLAB Medical Digital Services or VMware ?
Between SYNLAB Medical Digital Services and VMware, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SYNLAB Medical Digital Services and VMware, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA