Comparison Overview

Synechron

VS

SLB

Synechron

11 Times Square, Suite 3301, New York, NY, US, 10036
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.synechron.com

At Synechron, we believe in the power of digital to transform businesses for the better. Our global consulting firm combines creativity and innovative technology to deliver industry-leading digital solutions. Synechron’s progressive technologies and optimization strategies span end-to-end Artificial Intelligence, Consulting, Digital, Cloud & DevOps, Data, and Software Engineering, servicing an array of noteworthy financial services and technology firms. Through research and development initiatives in our FinLabs we develop solutions for modernization, from Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain to Data Science models, Digital Underwriting, mobile-first applications and more. Over the last 20+ years, our company has been honored with multiple employer awards, recognizing our commitment to our talented teams. With top clients to boast about, Synechron has a global workforce of 14,000+, and has 55 offices in 20 countries within key global markets. For more information on the company, please visit our website:www.synechron.com.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 14,201
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

SLB

5599 San Felipe St, Houston, 77056, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
https://www.slb.com

We are a technology company that unlocks access to energy for the benefit of all. As innovators, that’s been our mission for nearly a century. Today, we face a global imperative to create a future with more energy, but less carbon. Our diverse, innovative change makers are focused on going further in innovation and inventing the new energy technologies we need to get there.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 78,443
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/synechron.jpeg
Synechron
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slbglobal.jpeg
SLB
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Synechron
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SLB
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Synechron in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SLB in 2025.

Incident History — Synechron (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Synechron cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SLB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SLB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/synechron.jpeg
Synechron
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slbglobal.jpeg
SLB
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SLB company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Synechron company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SLB company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Synechron company.

In the current year, SLB company and Synechron company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SLB company nor Synechron company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SLB company nor Synechron company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SLB company nor Synechron company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Synechron company nor SLB company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Synechron nor SLB holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SLB company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Synechron company.

SLB company employs more people globally than Synechron company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Synechron nor SLB holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Synechron nor SLB holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Synechron nor SLB holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Synechron nor SLB holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Synechron nor SLB holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Synechron nor SLB holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References