Comparison Overview

Synacor

VS

Snowflake

Synacor

505 Ellicott St, Buffalo, New York, 14203, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Synacor is a cloud-based software and services company headquartered in Buffalo, New York with offices across the globe. We're known for serving global video, content, entertainment, internet and communications providers, device manufacturers, governments and enterprises. Our mission is to enable our customers to better engage with their consumers and partners. Our customers use Synacor’s technology platforms and services to scale their businesses and extend their subscriber relationships. We deliver email and collaboration platforms, and cloud-based identity management. Optimize your login experience with identity management tools & services utilizing Cloud ID: Scalable identity for TVE and Streaming media: www.cloudid.io Rethink Collaboration with Zimbra Productivity Suite: Zimbra creates a collaborative, secure, and seamless environment to improve team engagement for better productivity with email and collaborations tools: www.zimbra.com

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 192
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Snowflake

The Cloud, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

**Snowflake is proud to be the Official Data Collaboration Provider for LA28 and Team USA.** Snowflake delivers the AI Data Cloud — a global network where thousands of organizations mobilize data with near-unlimited scale, concurrency, and performance. Inside the AI Data Cloud, organizations unite their siloed data, easily discover and securely share governed data, and execute diverse analytic workloads. Wherever data or users live, Snowflake delivers a single and seamless experience across multiple public clouds. Snowflake’s platform is the engine that powers and provides access to the AI Data Cloud, creating a solution for data warehousing, data lakes, data engineering, data science, data application development, and data sharing. Join Snowflake customers, partners, and data providers already taking their businesses to new frontiers in the AI Data Cloud.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 10,269
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/synacor.jpeg
Synacor
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/snowflake-computing.jpeg
Snowflake
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Synacor
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Snowflake
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Synacor in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Snowflake in 2025.

Incident History — Synacor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Synacor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Snowflake (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Snowflake cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/synacor.jpeg
Synacor
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2019
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery)
Motivation: Establish initial footholds in enterprise environments, scan internal networks, access metadata services, and interact with backend systems
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/snowflake-computing.jpeg
Snowflake
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party contractor's employee
Motivation: Theft of customer credentials
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Multi-Channel Phishing (Email, SMS, Instant Messaging, Social Media, Malvertising), Malicious Links (Obfuscated, Hosted on Legitimate SaaS/Cloud Services), Fake CAPTCHA/Cloudflare Turnstile Lures (ClickFix), OAuth App Authorization Tricks (Device Code Flow, Salesforce Exploit), Malicious Browser Extensions (Takeover or New Installations), Malicious File Downloads (HTA, SVG, Executables), Stolen Credentials (From Phishing/Infostealers), MFA Gaps (Ghost Logins, SSO Misconfigurations)
Motivation: Data Theft (Extortion, Dark Web Sales), Financial Gain (Ransomware, Fraud), Account Takeover (Business Email Compromise, SaaS Abuse), Espionage (Corporate/Competitive Intelligence)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Snowflake company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Synacor company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Snowflake company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Synacor company.

In the current year, Snowflake company and Synacor company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Snowflake company nor Synacor company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Snowflake company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Synacor company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Snowflake company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Synacor company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Synacor company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Snowflake company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Synacor nor Snowflake holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Snowflake company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Synacor company.

Snowflake company employs more people globally than Synacor company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Synacor nor Snowflake holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Synacor nor Snowflake holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Synacor nor Snowflake holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Synacor nor Snowflake holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Synacor nor Snowflake holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Synacor nor Snowflake holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X