Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Symrise Food & Beverage NASymrise Food & Beverage NA
VS
Red BullRed Bull
Symrise Food & Beverage NA

Symrise Food & Beverage NA

300 North St, Teterboro, 07608, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://in-sight.symrise.com
767/1000Fair

We are a global flavor partner working with clients to develop new ideas, consumer insight driven innovation and market-ready solutions. Based in Teterboro, NJ, our taste, health and nutrition division offers taste solutions for beverages, sweets, snack products, culina...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Red Bull

Red Bull

Am Brunnen 1, Fuschl, 5330, AT

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.redbull.com/jobs
820/1000Good

Red Bull Gives Wiiings to People and Ideas. This has driven us – and all we do – since 1987. Today, Red Bull operates in over 170 countries, selling more than 12 billion cans annually and growing! Above all, our people remain the essential ingredient in bringing the Red...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:29,022
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Symrise Food & Beverage NA

Symrise Food & Beverage NA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Red Bull

Red Bull

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Symrise Food & Beverage NA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Bull in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Symrise Food & Beverage NA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Symrise Food & Beverage NA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Red Bull (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Bull cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Symrise Food & Beverage NA

Symrise Food & Beverage NA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Red Bull

Red Bull

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Symrise Food & Beverage NA company and Red Bull company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Symrise Food & Beverage NA company and Red Bull company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Symrise Food & Beverage NA company and Red Bull company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Symrise Food & Beverage NA company and Red Bull company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Symrise Food & Beverage NA company and Red Bull company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Symrise Food & Beverage NA company and Red Bull company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Symrise Food & Beverage NA company and Red Bull company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Symrise Food & Beverage NA company and Red Bull company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Symrise Food & Beverage NA company and Red Bull company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Symrise Food & Beverage NA company and Red Bull company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Symrise Food & Beverage NA company and Red Bull company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Symrise Food & Beverage NA and Red Bull, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Symrise Food & Beverage NA and Red Bull, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Symrise Food & Beverage NA or Red Bull ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Symrise Food & Beverage NA or Red Bull ?
Between Symrise Food & Beverage NA and Red Bull, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Symrise Food & Beverage NA and Red Bull, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2