Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SymantecSymantec
VS
NiCENiCE
Symantec

Symantec

1320 Ridder Park Dr, San Jose, 95131, US

Last Update: 09/07/2026

View Profile
552/1000Very Poor

Your backstage pass to the most epic cybersecurity solutions on the market for Endpoint, Network, Data and Cloud security. Featuring worldwide (yet local-to-you) partner experts with the chops to deliver enterprise-grade security, whether you're a solo act or a supergro...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:12,813
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4
NiCE

NiCE

221 River St, Hoboken, New Jersey, US, 07030

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nice.com
785/1000Fair

NiCE is transforming the world with AI that puts people first. Our purpose-built AI-powered platforms automate engagements into proactive, safe, intelligent actions, empowering individuals and organizations to innovate and act, from interaction to resolution. Trusted b...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:14,251
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Symantec

Symantec

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NiCE

NiCE

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Symantec has 90.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NiCE in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Symantec (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Symantec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NiCE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NiCE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Symantec

Symantec

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SYM1783607031
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SOPCROSYM1770623613
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CISSYMFBIFOR1768715192
NiCE

NiCE

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Symantec company and NiCE company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Symantec company and NiCE company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Symantec company and NiCE company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Symantec company and NiCE company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Symantec company and NiCE company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Symantec company and NiCE company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Symantec company and NiCE company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Symantec company and NiCE company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Symantec company and NiCE company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Symantec company and NiCE company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Symantec company and NiCE company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Symantec and NiCE, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Symantec and NiCE, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Symantec or NiCE ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Symantec or NiCE ?
Between Symantec and NiCE, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Symantec and NiCE, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA