Comparison Overview
Symantec
Symantec
1320 Ridder Park Dr, San Jose, 95131, US
Last Update: 09/07/2026
Your backstage pass to the most epic cybersecurity solutions on the market for Endpoint, Network, Data and Cloud security. Featuring worldwide (yet local-to-you) partner experts with the chops to deliver enterprise-grade security, whether you're a solo act or a supergro...
Cisco
Tasman Way, San Jose, 95134, US
Last Update: 13/10/2026
Cisco is the worldwide technology leader that is revolutionizing the way organizations connect and protect in the AI era. For more than 40 years, Cisco has securely connected the world. With its industry leading AI-powered solutions and services, Cisco enables its custo...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Symantec
Cisco
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Symantec has 90.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Cisco has 3625.49% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Symantec (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Symantec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Cisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Symantec
Cisco
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.