Comparison Overview
Sykehuset Innlandet
Sykehuset Innlandet
Furnesveien 26, Brumunddal, Brumunddal, 2381, NO
Last Update: 26/01/2026
Sykehuset Innlandet HF er et av landets største helseforetak med om lag 10 000 ansatte, og et stort antall faggrupper. Helseforetaket har virksomhet på 49 ulike steder i Hedmark og Oppland innen somatikk, psykisk helsevern, rusomsorg og prehospitale tjenester. Sykehuset...
Philips
Amstelplein 2, Amsterdam, 1096 BC, NL
Last Update: 05/04/2026
Over the past decade we have transformed into a focused leader in health technology. At Philips, our purpose is to improve people’s health and well-being through meaningful innovation. We aim to improve 2.5 billion lives per year by 2030, including 400 million in under...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Sykehuset Innlandet
Philips
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sykehuset Innlandet in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
Philips has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Sykehuset Innlandet (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sykehuset Innlandet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Philips (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Philips cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Sykehuset Innlandet
Philips
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.