Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Swissport Japan Ltd.Swissport Japan Ltd.
VS
LATAM AirlinesLATAM Airlines
Swissport Japan Ltd.

Swissport Japan Ltd.

中町2-3-20, 泉佐野市, 大阪府, 598-0013, JP

Last Update: 06/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.swissport.co.jp
752/1000Fair

Swissport Japan Ltd., a joint venture between Swissport International Ltd. and the Marubeni Corporation, provides ground services according to customer's request in the aviation sector. With a workforce of more than 860 personnel, Swissport Japan is active at 5 stations...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:146
Subsidiaries:39
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
LATAM Airlines

LATAM Airlines

Avenida Presidente Riesco 5711, Edificio Huidobro, Las Condes, Región Metropolitana de Santiago, CL, 7561114

Last Update: 18/07/2026

View Profile
788/1000Fair

We are the leading airline in South America with the largest destinations, frequencies and aircraft fleet offer. We have the largest network of domestic destinations in five South American markets: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru, and international operations...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:44,562
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Swissport Japan Ltd.

Swissport Japan Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
LATAM Airlines

LATAM Airlines

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swissport Japan Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LATAM Airlines in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Swissport Japan Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swissport Japan Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - LATAM Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LATAM Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Swissport Japan Ltd.

Swissport Japan Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
LATAM Airlines

LATAM Airlines

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Swissport Japan Ltd. company and LATAM Airlines company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Swissport Japan Ltd. company and LATAM Airlines company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Swissport Japan Ltd. company and LATAM Airlines company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Swissport Japan Ltd. company and LATAM Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Swissport Japan Ltd. company and LATAM Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Swissport Japan Ltd. company and LATAM Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Swissport Japan Ltd. company and LATAM Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Swissport Japan Ltd. company and LATAM Airlines company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Swissport Japan Ltd. company and LATAM Airlines company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Swissport Japan Ltd. company and LATAM Airlines company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Swissport Japan Ltd. company and LATAM Airlines company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Swissport Japan Ltd. and LATAM Airlines, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Swissport Japan Ltd. and LATAM Airlines, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Swissport Japan Ltd. or LATAM Airlines ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Swissport Japan Ltd. or LATAM Airlines ?
Between Swissport Japan Ltd. and LATAM Airlines, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Swissport Japan Ltd. and LATAM Airlines, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2