Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Swissôtel AmsterdamSwissôtel Amsterdam
VS
Radisson Hotel GroupRadisson Hotel Group
Swissôtel Amsterdam

Swissôtel Amsterdam

Damrak 96, Amsterdam, undefined, 1012 LP, NL

Last Update: 01/11/2025

View Profile
771/1000Fair

Swissôtel Amsterdam is a 4-star boutique hotel, boasting the best location in town, right at Dam Square in the heart of the city centre. Situated just 20 km from Schiphol Airport and a short walk from Central Station, this 4-star boutique hotel offers a perfect base for...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:14
Subsidiaries:104
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Radisson Hotel Group

Radisson Hotel Group

44 Avenue du Bourget, Brussels, B-1130, BE

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
815/1000Good

Radisson Hotel Group is an international hotel group, operating in EMEA and APAC with over 1,320 hotels in operation and under development in +95 countries. The international hotel group is rapidly expanding with a plan to significantly grow the portfolio. The Group’s o...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:17,162
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Swissôtel Amsterdam

Swissôtel Amsterdam

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Radisson Hotel Group

Radisson Hotel Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swissôtel Amsterdam in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Radisson Hotel Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Swissôtel Amsterdam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swissôtel Amsterdam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Radisson Hotel Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Radisson Hotel Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Swissôtel Amsterdam

Swissôtel Amsterdam

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Radisson Hotel Group

Radisson Hotel Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Swissôtel Amsterdam company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Swissôtel Amsterdam company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Swissôtel Amsterdam company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Swissôtel Amsterdam company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Swissôtel Amsterdam company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Swissôtel Amsterdam company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Swissôtel Amsterdam company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Swissôtel Amsterdam company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Swissôtel Amsterdam company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Swissôtel Amsterdam company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Swissôtel Amsterdam company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Swissôtel Amsterdam and Radisson Hotel Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Swissôtel Amsterdam and Radisson Hotel Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Swissôtel Amsterdam or Radisson Hotel Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Swissôtel Amsterdam or Radisson Hotel Group ?
Between Swissôtel Amsterdam and Radisson Hotel Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Swissôtel Amsterdam and Radisson Hotel Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3