Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Swissôtel ChicagoSwissôtel Chicago
VS
Travel + Leisure Co.Travel + Leisure Co.
Swissôtel Chicago

Swissôtel Chicago

323 E Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL, 60601, US

Last Update: 21/12/2025

View Profile
773/1000Fair

Inspiring Vitality Experiences one Heart at a Time Made possible by Harry Weese's visionary design, Swissôtel Chicago boasts "forever"​ views of the Chicago skyline, Navy Pier, and Lake Michigan. Our colleague culture is inspired by Vitality; united by a common goal to...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:139
Subsidiaries:104
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Travel + Leisure Co.

Travel + Leisure Co.

6277 Sea Harbor Dr, Orlando, Florida, US, 32821

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
797/1000Fair

Travel + Leisure Co., the world's leading vacation ownership and membership travel company, provides more than six million vacations to travelers every year. The company’s extensive Vacation Ownership portfolio includes trusted and iconic vacation club brands with a com...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:14,631
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Swissôtel Chicago

Swissôtel Chicago

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Travel + Leisure Co.

Travel + Leisure Co.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swissôtel Chicago in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Travel + Leisure Co. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Swissôtel Chicago (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swissôtel Chicago cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Travel + Leisure Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Travel + Leisure Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Swissôtel Chicago

Swissôtel Chicago

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Travel + Leisure Co.

Travel + Leisure Co.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Swissôtel Chicago company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Swissôtel Chicago company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Swissôtel Chicago company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Swissôtel Chicago company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Swissôtel Chicago company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Swissôtel Chicago company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Swissôtel Chicago company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Swissôtel Chicago company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Swissôtel Chicago company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Swissôtel Chicago company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Swissôtel Chicago company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Swissôtel Chicago and Travel + Leisure Co., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Swissôtel Chicago and Travel + Leisure Co., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Swissôtel Chicago or Travel + Leisure Co. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Swissôtel Chicago or Travel + Leisure Co. ?
Between Swissôtel Chicago and Travel + Leisure Co., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Swissôtel Chicago and Travel + Leisure Co., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2