Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International CommandSWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command
VS
US NavyUS Navy
SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command

SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command

Kasernenstrasse 8, Stans-Oberdorf NW, 6370, CH

Last Update: 07/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.peacekeeping.ch
753/1000Fair

Friedensförderung im internationalen Rahmen ist einer der drei Aufträge der Schweizer Armee und ist als solcher im Militärgesetz verankert. Ausgeführt wird dieser Auftrag durch das Kompetenzzentrum SWISSINT in Stans. Die Umsetzung des Armeeauftrages «Friedensförderung»​...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:17
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
US Navy

US Navy

1200 Navy Pentagon, Washington, 20350, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.navy.mil/
794/1000Fair

The United States is a maritime nation, and the U.S. Navy protects America at sea. Alongside our allies and partners, we defend freedom, preserve economic prosperity, and keep the seas open and free. Our nation is engaged in long-term competition. To defend American int...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:161,815
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command

SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
US Navy

US Navy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for US Navy in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - US Navy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Navy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command

SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
US Navy

US Navy

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
US-005090624
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
US-425092125
🔒 Incident : Breach
USN2036171122

FAQ

Between SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command company and US Navy company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command company and US Navy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command company and US Navy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command company and US Navy company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command company and US Navy company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command company and US Navy company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command company and US Navy company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command company and US Navy company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command company and US Navy company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command company and US Navy company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command company and US Navy company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command and US Navy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command and US Navy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command or US Navy ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command or US Navy ?
Between SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command and US Navy, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SWISSINT - Swiss Armed Forces International Command and US Navy, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1