Comparison Overview

Swiss Re

VS

QBE Insurance

Swiss Re

Mythenquai 50/60, Zurich, Zurich, CH, 8022
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 800 and 849

The Swiss Re Group is a leading wholesale provider of reinsurance, insurance and other insurance-based forms of risk transfer. Dealing direct and working through brokers, its global client base consists of insurance companies, mid-to-large-sized corporations and public sector clients. From standard products to tailor-made coverage across all lines of business, Swiss Re deploys its capital strength, expertise and innovation power to enable the risk taking upon which enterprise and progress in society depend. Founded in Zurich, Switzerland, in 1863, Swiss Re serves clients through a network of over 70 offices globally and is rated "AA-"​ by Standard & Poor's, "Aa3"​ by Moody's and "A+"​ by A.M. Best. Registered shares in the Swiss Re Group holding company, Swiss Re Ltd, are listed in accordance with the Main Standard on the SIX Swiss Exchange and trade under the symbol SREN. We're smarter together. For more information about Swiss Re Group, please visit: www.swissre.com, follow us on X @SwissRe and subscribe our YouTube channel @swissretv.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 13,128
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

QBE Insurance

388 George Street, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

QBE is an international insurer and reinsurer listed on the Australian Securities Exchange and headquartered in Sydney. We employ over 13,000 people in 26 countries. Leveraging our deep expertise and insights, QBE offers commercial, personal and specialty products and risk management solutions to help people and businesses manage risks, build strength and embrace change to their advantage. See our Terms of Use: qbe.co/2y7Ck4p See our Privacy Policy: qbe.co/3oa7gZB

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 13,832
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swiss-re.jpeg
Swiss Re
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qbe.jpeg
QBE Insurance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Swiss Re
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
QBE Insurance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swiss Re in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for QBE Insurance in 2026.

Incident History — Swiss Re (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swiss Re cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — QBE Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

QBE Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swiss-re.jpeg
Swiss Re
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qbe.jpeg
QBE Insurance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Swiss Re company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to QBE Insurance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, QBE Insurance company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Swiss Re company.

In the current year, QBE Insurance company and Swiss Re company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither QBE Insurance company nor Swiss Re company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither QBE Insurance company nor Swiss Re company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither QBE Insurance company nor Swiss Re company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Swiss Re company nor QBE Insurance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Swiss Re nor QBE Insurance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

QBE Insurance company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Swiss Re company.

QBE Insurance company employs more people globally than Swiss Re company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Swiss Re nor QBE Insurance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Swiss Re nor QBE Insurance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Swiss Re nor QBE Insurance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Swiss Re nor QBE Insurance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Swiss Re nor QBE Insurance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Swiss Re nor QBE Insurance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H