Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sutter Health - Bay AreaSutter Health - Bay Area
VS
Cincinnati Children'sCincinnati Children's
Sutter Health - Bay Area

Sutter Health - Bay Area

San Francisco Bay Area, 94115, US

Last Update: 11/03/2026

View Profile

Sutter Bay Medical Foundation supports the growth and development of four affiliated medical groups spanning all regions of the San Francisco Bay Area: Palo Alto Foundation Medical Group Sansum Santa Barbara Medical Clinic, Inc Sutter East Bay Medical Group Sutter Med...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:1,370
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Cincinnati Children's

Cincinnati Children's

US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
785/1000Fair

Cincinnati Children’s, a nonprofit academic medical center established in 1883, offers services from well-child care to treatment for the most rare and complex conditions. It is the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and trains ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:16,334
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sutter Health - Bay Area

Sutter Health - Bay Area

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cincinnati Children's

Cincinnati Children's

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sutter Health - Bay Area in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cincinnati Children's in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sutter Health - Bay Area (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sutter Health - Bay Area cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cincinnati Children's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cincinnati Children's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sutter Health - Bay Area

Sutter Health - Bay Area

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Cincinnati Children's

Cincinnati Children's

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sutter Health - Bay Area company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sutter Health - Bay Area company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sutter Health - Bay Area company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sutter Health - Bay Area company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sutter Health - Bay Area company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sutter Health - Bay Area company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sutter Health - Bay Area company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sutter Health - Bay Area company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sutter Health - Bay Area company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sutter Health - Bay Area company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sutter Health - Bay Area company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sutter Health - Bay Area and Cincinnati Children's, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sutter Health - Bay Area and Cincinnati Children's, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sutter Health - Bay Area or Cincinnati Children's ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sutter Health - Bay Area or Cincinnati Children's ?
Between Sutter Health - Bay Area and Cincinnati Children's, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sutter Health - Bay Area and Cincinnati Children's, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8