Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sutherland Healthcare SolutionsSutherland Healthcare Solutions
VS
The Cigna GroupThe Cigna Group
Sutherland Healthcare Solutions

Sutherland Healthcare Solutions

2 Brighton Road, Clifton, 07012, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile

Analytics-driven business process and technology solutions to optimize healthcare’s financial and clinical performance. Sutherland is an experience-led digital transformation company. Our mission is to deliver exceptionally engineered experiences for customers and emp...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:4,192
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
The Cigna Group

The Cigna Group

900 Cottage Grove Rd, Bloomfield, 06002, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
746/1000Moderate

The Cigna Group is a global health company committed to creating a better future built on the vitality of every individual and every community. We relentlessly challenge ourselves to partner and innovate solutions for better health. The Cigna Group includes products a...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:21,598
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sutherland Healthcare Solutions

Sutherland Healthcare Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The Cigna Group

The Cigna Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sutherland Healthcare Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Cigna Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sutherland Healthcare Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sutherland Healthcare Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The Cigna Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Cigna Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sutherland Healthcare Solutions

Sutherland Healthcare Solutions

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SUT354072925
The Cigna Group

The Cigna Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE1768961826
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE232072525

FAQ

Between Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company and The Cigna Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company and The Cigna Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company and The Cigna Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company and The Cigna Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company and The Cigna Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company and The Cigna Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company and The Cigna Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company and The Cigna Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company and The Cigna Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company and The Cigna Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sutherland Healthcare Solutions company and The Cigna Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sutherland Healthcare Solutions and The Cigna Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sutherland Healthcare Solutions and The Cigna Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sutherland Healthcare Solutions or The Cigna Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sutherland Healthcare Solutions or The Cigna Group ?
Between Sutherland Healthcare Solutions and The Cigna Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sutherland Healthcare Solutions and The Cigna Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89322
SUMMARY

Vault and Vault Enterprise did not consistently evaluate ACL policies against the canonical form of resource and policy names. This may allow an authenticated user with delegated permissions to bypass an explicit deny restriction and access a protected resource or assign a denied policy, potentially leading to privilege escalation. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-89322) is fixed in Vault Community Edition 2.1.2, and Vault Enterprise 2.1.2, 1.21.12, 1.20.17, and 1.19.23.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-107314
SUMMARY

pgjdbc, the PostgreSQL JDBC Driver, versions 42.7.11 through 42.7.13 enforce no restriction when the requireAuth connection property excludes all six authentication methods the driver knows, for example requireAuth=!password,!md5,!gss,!sspi,!scram-sha-256,!none. The driver then accepts any method the server asks for, including cleartext password authentication. A value without a method in it, such as requireAuth=, (a single comma), is affected the same way. An attacker positioned between the application and its server can ask for cleartext password authentication and receive the database password. A positive list such as requireAuth=scram-sha-256, and a partial exclusion such as requireAuth=!password,!md5, are enforced correctly. The property has no default value, so a deployment that does not set it is not affected. 42.7.14 fixes the problem: such a connection is refused with SQLState 08004, and a value without a method in it is rejected as invalid.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107285
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, a proxied ws request is carried through CONNECT, but NettyRequestFactory.newNettyRequest and requestUri decide whether to attach proxy authentication and an absolute-form target only from whether the URI is secure. Because ws is not marked secure, the tunneled WebSocket upgrade sent to the origin includes the proxy's Proxy-Authorization value. Basic credentials are directly recoverable and Digest responses can be replayed or cracked offline. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107284
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, WebSocketHandler.upgrade aborts a handshake whose Sec-WebSocket-Accept value is missing or invalid but continues into pipeline installation and onOpen delivery. Frames coalesced with the invalid 101 response can be decoded and delivered from a peer that did not prove the handshake, although the request future fails and the channel closes. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107283
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, Realm.Builder generates the HTTP Digest client nonce with ThreadLocalRandom rather than a cryptographically secure random source. Digest relies on an unpredictable cnonce to resist chosen-plaintext and credential precomputation attacks, so an observer able to infer generator state can reduce the protection of the authentication exchange. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2