Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey)Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey)
VS
Hillsborough County Public SchoolsHillsborough County Public Schools
Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey)

Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey)

14033 92 Avenue, Surrey, BC, CA, V3V0B7

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.surreyschools.ca
772/1000Fair

Surrey Schools (School District #36) operates schools in Surrey and White Rock, British Columbia. It is the largest school district in British Columbia with approximately 77,000 students. Surrey Schools includes 103 elementary schools, 21 secondary schools, five student...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:3,191
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Hillsborough County Public Schools

Hillsborough County Public Schools

US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
740/1000Moderate

Hillsborough County Public Schools is the seventh largest school district in the nation, with more than 210,000 students. More than 50,000 students attend a school through one of the district’s many school choice programs. HCPS is the largest employer in Hillsborough C...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:13,483
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey)

Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hillsborough County Public Schools

Hillsborough County Public Schools

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hillsborough County Public Schools in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hillsborough County Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hillsborough County Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey)

Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SUR16306622
Hillsborough County Public Schools

Hillsborough County Public Schools

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
HIL204517923

FAQ

Between Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company and Hillsborough County Public Schools company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company and Hillsborough County Public Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company and Hillsborough County Public Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company and Hillsborough County Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company and Hillsborough County Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company and Hillsborough County Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company and Hillsborough County Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company and Hillsborough County Public Schools company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company and Hillsborough County Public Schools company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company and Hillsborough County Public Schools company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company and Hillsborough County Public Schools company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) and Hillsborough County Public Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) and Hillsborough County Public Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) or Hillsborough County Public Schools ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) or Hillsborough County Public Schools ?
Between Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) and Hillsborough County Public Schools, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) and Hillsborough County Public Schools, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1