Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SurfsharkSurfshark
VS
Tata ElxsiTata Elxsi
Surfshark

Surfshark

Švitrigailos gatvė 34, New Town, 03222, LT

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://surfshark.com/career
439/1000Critical

Surfshark is a fast-growing cybersecurity company focused on developing humanized privacy & security protection solutions to secure people's digital lives. Its core product is one of the TOP 3 VPNs globally, trusted by millions of users around the world. Additionally, S...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:495
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2
Tata Elxsi

Tata Elxsi

ITBP Road, Bangalore, 560 048, IN

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tataelxsi.com
759/1000Fair

Tata Elxsi is amongst the world’s leading providers of design and technology services across industries, including Automotive, Media & Entertainment, Communications, and Healthcare. Tata Elxsi is helping customers reimagine their products and services through design thi...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:15,983
Subsidiaries:67
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Surfshark

Surfshark

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tata Elxsi

Tata Elxsi

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Surfshark has 36.99% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Elxsi in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Surfshark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Surfshark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tata Elxsi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Elxsi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Surfshark

Surfshark

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SUR1789058174
🔒 Incident : Breach
SUR1778164255
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SURSIGULT1774535812
Tata Elxsi

Tata Elxsi

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Surfshark company and Tata Elxsi company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Surfshark company and Tata Elxsi company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Surfshark company and Tata Elxsi company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Surfshark company and Tata Elxsi company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Surfshark company and Tata Elxsi company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Surfshark company and Tata Elxsi company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Surfshark company and Tata Elxsi company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Surfshark company and Tata Elxsi company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Surfshark company and Tata Elxsi company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Surfshark company and Tata Elxsi company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Surfshark company and Tata Elxsi company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Surfshark and Tata Elxsi, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Surfshark and Tata Elxsi, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Surfshark or Tata Elxsi ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Surfshark or Tata Elxsi ?
Between Surfshark and Tata Elxsi, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Surfshark and Tata Elxsi, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103342
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103065
SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105122
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105121
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
REFERENCES