Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SurfsharkSurfshark
VS
KyndrylKyndryl
Surfshark

Surfshark

Švitrigailos gatvė 34, New Town, 03222, LT

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
439/1000Critical

Surfshark is a fast-growing cybersecurity company focused on developing humanized privacy & security protection solutions to secure people's digital lives. Its core product is one of the TOP 3 VPNs globally, trusted by millions of users around the world. Additionally, S...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:495
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2
Kyndryl

Kyndryl

New York City, US

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://kyndryl.com
651/1000Weak

We have the world’s best talent that design, run, and manage the most advanced and reliable technology infrastructure each day. Together, we think holistically about the health of these vital technology ecosystems. We are a focused, independent company that builds on o...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:61,535
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Surfshark

Surfshark

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kyndryl

Kyndryl

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Surfshark has 35.14% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Kyndryl has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Surfshark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Surfshark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kyndryl (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kyndryl cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Surfshark

Surfshark

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SUR1789058174
🔒 Incident : Breach
SUR1778164255
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SURSIGULT1774535812
Kyndryl

Kyndryl

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HCLTAT1786448292
🔒 Incident : Breach
IHGHCLGAPWYNMCDVODKYNMIC1786975327

FAQ

Between Surfshark company and Kyndryl company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Surfshark company and Kyndryl company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Surfshark company and Kyndryl company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Surfshark company and Kyndryl company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Surfshark company and Kyndryl company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Surfshark company and Kyndryl company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Surfshark company and Kyndryl company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Surfshark company and Kyndryl company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Surfshark company and Kyndryl company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Surfshark company and Kyndryl company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Surfshark company and Kyndryl company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Surfshark and Kyndryl, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Surfshark and Kyndryl, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Surfshark or Kyndryl ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Surfshark or Kyndryl ?
Between Surfshark and Kyndryl, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Surfshark and Kyndryl, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9