Comparison Overview
Surfshark
Surfshark
Švitrigailos gatvė 34, New Town, 03222, LT
Last Update: 25/05/2026
Surfshark is a fast-growing cybersecurity company focused on developing humanized privacy & security protection solutions to secure people's digital lives. Its core product is one of the TOP 3 VPNs globally, trusted by millions of users around the world. Additionally, S...
AlmavivA Group
Via di Casal Boccone, 188-190, Roma, IT, 00137
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Almaviva is the Italian digital innovation group that supports the country’s growth by helping enterprises meet the challenges of staying competitive in the digital age. The Group helps organizations transform their business models, operational structures, corporate cul...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Surfshark
AlmavivA Group
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
Surfshark has 34.21% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AlmavivA Group in 2026.
Incident History - Surfshark (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Surfshark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - AlmavivA Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AlmavivA Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Surfshark
AlmavivA Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A flaw has been found in Comfast CF-WR631AX V3 up to 2.7.0.8. This issue affects the function system of the file /cgi-bin/mbox-config?section=ping_config of the component API Endpoint. This manipulation of the argument destination causes os command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A vulnerability was detected in activepieces up to 0.83.0. This vulnerability affects the function handleUrlFile in the library packages/server/engine/src/lib/variables/processors/file.ts of the component File URL Handler. The manipulation results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A security vulnerability has been detected in Radware Cyber Controller up to 10.11.0. This affects an unknown part of the component HTML Report Generation. The manipulation leads to HTML injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A weakness has been identified in kortix-ai suna up to 0.8.38. Affected by this issue is the function router.replace/router.push of the file apps/frontend/src/app/auth/page.tsx of the component Auth Endpoint. Executing a manipulation of the argument returnURL can lead to cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Upgrading to version 0.8.39 can resolve this issue. This patch is called f5dec7aa0c1b8fa0125938f292c0f2430ca75f6c. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The researcher explains: "The issue was fixed in v0.8.39 without notifying the wider user base via a security disclosure."
- https://gist.github.com/TrebledJ/fe7241910ac0aaeff86243fc88e9ffed
- https://github.com/kortix-ai/suna/
- https://github.com/kortix-ai/suna/commit/f5dec7aa0c1b8fa0125938f292c0f2430ca75f6c
- https://github.com/kortix-ai/suna/releases/tag/v0.8.39
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-12811
- https://vuldb.com/submit/837175
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/372605
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/372605/cti
A security flaw has been discovered in Edimax BR-6478AC V2 1.23. Affected by this vulnerability is the function mp of the file /goform/mp of the component POST Request Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument command results in command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.