Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SURA Asset ManagementSURA Asset Management
VS
XP Inc.XP Inc.
SURA Asset Management

SURA Asset Management

Carrera 43A 3-101, Medellin, 050022, CO

Last Update: 06/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sura-am.com/
762/1000Fair

SURA Asset Management es la Compañía número uno en Pensiones en Latinoamérica, especializada en Ahorro e Inversión, con presencia en Chile, Colombia, El Salvador, Perú, México y Uruguay. Es filial del Grupo Empresarial SURA y contamos con dos inversionistas que poseen ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:926
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
XP Inc.

XP Inc.

Avenida Chedid Jafet 75, Torre sul 30º andar, São Paulo, São Paulo, BR, 04551-065

Last Update: 19/05/2026

View Profile
792/1000Fair

A XP Inc. é uma das maiores instituições financeiras independente do Brasil, dona das marcas XP, Rico, Clear, XP Educação, InfoMoney, entre outras. Com mais de 4,6 milhões de clientes ativos e um valor superior a R$ 1,3 trilhão de ativos sob custódia, há 24 anos vem tra...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:12,987
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SURA Asset Management

SURA Asset Management

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
XP Inc.

XP Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SURA Asset Management in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for XP Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SURA Asset Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SURA Asset Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - XP Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

XP Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SURA Asset Management

SURA Asset Management

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
XP Inc.

XP Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SURA Asset Management company and XP Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SURA Asset Management company and XP Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SURA Asset Management company and XP Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SURA Asset Management company and XP Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SURA Asset Management company and XP Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SURA Asset Management company and XP Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SURA Asset Management company and XP Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SURA Asset Management company and XP Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SURA Asset Management company and XP Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SURA Asset Management company and XP Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SURA Asset Management company and XP Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SURA Asset Management and XP Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SURA Asset Management and XP Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SURA Asset Management or XP Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SURA Asset Management or XP Inc. ?
Between SURA Asset Management and XP Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SURA Asset Management and XP Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2