Comparison Overview
Supermicro

Supermicro
980 Rock Avenue, San Jose, CA, US, 95131
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Supermicro® (NASDAQ:SMCI), with 30+ years of leadership in Enterprise, cloud, AI, and 5G Telco/Edge Infrastructure solutions, pioneers the industry with Building Block Solutions® and Green Computing servers. Its customizable, efficient, and sustainable IT offerings such...

Seagate Technology
47488 Kato Rd, Fremont, CA, US, 94538
Last Update: 31/03/2026
Seagate is a leader in mass-capacity data storage. We’ve delivered more than four and a half billion terabytes of capacity over the past four decades. We make storage that scales, bringing trust and integrity to innovations that depend on data. In an era of unprecedente...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Supermicro







Seagate Technology






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Supermicro in 2026.
Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Seagate Technology in 2026.
Incident History - Supermicro (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Supermicro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Seagate Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Seagate Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Supermicro

Seagate Technology
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.