Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Supermercados Pague MenosSupermercados Pague Menos
VS
Albertsons CompaniesAlbertsons Companies
Supermercados Pague Menos

Supermercados Pague Menos

Rodovia Luiz de Queiroz, KM 142, Vale das Cigarras, Santa Bárbara d'Oeste, São Paulo, BR, 13450-860

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
784/1000Fair

Inaugurada em 1989, a Rede de Supermercados Pague Menos possui hoje mais 20 lojas em funcionamento em 12 municípios do Estado de São Paulo, nas seguintes cidades: - Americana (SP) - Artur Nogueira (SP) - Boituva (SP) - Campinas (SP) - Hortolândia (SP) - Indaiatuba...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:4,442
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Albertsons Companies

Albertsons Companies

250 E Parkcenter BLVD, Boise, 83706, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
723/1000Moderate

Albertsons Companies is one of the largest food and drug retailers in the United States, with over 2,200 stores in 34 states and the District of Columbia. Our well-known banners include Albertsons, Safeway, Vons, Jewel-Osco, Shaw's, Acme, Tom Thumb, Randalls, United Sup...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:112,179
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Supermercados Pague Menos

Supermercados Pague Menos

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Albertsons Companies

Albertsons Companies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Supermercados Pague Menos in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Albertsons Companies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Supermercados Pague Menos (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Supermercados Pague Menos cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Albertsons Companies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Albertsons Companies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Supermercados Pague Menos

Supermercados Pague Menos

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Albertsons Companies

Albertsons Companies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ALB024090625
🔒 Incident : Breach
ALB912072525
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ALB033090625

FAQ

Between Supermercados Pague Menos company and Albertsons Companies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Supermercados Pague Menos company and Albertsons Companies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Supermercados Pague Menos company and Albertsons Companies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Supermercados Pague Menos company and Albertsons Companies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Supermercados Pague Menos company and Albertsons Companies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Supermercados Pague Menos company and Albertsons Companies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Supermercados Pague Menos company and Albertsons Companies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Supermercados Pague Menos company and Albertsons Companies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Supermercados Pague Menos company and Albertsons Companies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Supermercados Pague Menos company and Albertsons Companies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Supermercados Pague Menos company and Albertsons Companies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Supermercados Pague Menos and Albertsons Companies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Supermercados Pague Menos and Albertsons Companies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Supermercados Pague Menos or Albertsons Companies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Supermercados Pague Menos or Albertsons Companies ?
Between Supermercados Pague Menos and Albertsons Companies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Supermercados Pague Menos and Albertsons Companies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2