SCSFL A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
SCSFL
Company Information
Website:http://www.supecargo.gr
Employees number:34
Number of followers:341
NAICS:484
Industry Type:Truck Transportation
Homepage:http://www.supecargo.gr
SCSFL Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
SCSFLTruck Transportation
Updated:
31/03/2026
31/03/2026
744/1000
Moderate
Ba
SCSFL Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
SCSFLTruck Transportation
Score locked

SCSFLModerate
Current Score
744Ba (MODERATE)
01000
1 incidents
0 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JULY 2026
745
JUNE 2026
744
MAY 2026
744
APRIL 2026
744
MARCH 2026
744
FEBRUARY 2026
743
JANUARY 2026
743
DECEMBER 2025
743
NOVEMBER 2025
742
OCTOBER 2025
742
SEPTEMBER 2025
741
AUGUST 2025
741
JUNE 2024
749
Cyber Attack
16 Jun 2024 • SCSFL
Cargo Shipping Company (Norway/Greece/Netherlands - unspecified)
Mustang Panda Cyber Attack on European Cargo Shipping Companies (2024)
734
HIGH-15
SUP501092125
In early 2024, Mustang Panda, a state-sponsored threat actor, executed a targeted cyber campaign against European cargo shipping firms in Norway, Greece, and the Netherlands using Korplug malware loaders. The attack vector involved malicious USB drives with deceptive filenames, exploiting human error to infiltrate systems. While some malware samples were detected and blocked by security measures, others evaded detection through altered signatures and DLL hijacking techniques, allowing persistent access.The compromise disrupted operational integrity, with potential risks including unauthorized data access, supply chain interference, and financial fraud—though the article does not confirm large-scale data exfiltration or ransom demands. The attack also revealed tactical overlaps with CeranaKeeper, another APT group using distinct tools like TONESHELL, suggesting shared infrastructure but independent operations. The incident underscores vulnerabilities in maritime logistics, where third-party USB devices and legacy system dependencies create exploitable gaps. No public reports confirm customer data breaches, ransomware deployment, or critical infrastructure damage, but the intrusion poses reputational harm, regulatory scrutiny, and potential financial losses from remediation and downtime.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
REFERENCES
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for SCSFL ??
What was SCSFL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ??
What was SCSFL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was SCSFL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was SCSFL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was SCSFL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was SCSFL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was SCSFL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was SCSFL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was SCSFL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was SCSFL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What was SCSFL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on SCSFL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with SCSFL ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view SCSFL's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?