Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Superb ShiftsSuperb Shifts
VS
Mass General BrighamMass General Brigham
Superb Shifts

Superb Shifts

Omaha , 68144, US

Last Update: 03/08/2026

View Profile
695/1000Weak

An App📱 connecting healthcare workers to open shifts in Senior Living AIM Tech Startup of the Year - 2023 🌟

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:35
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Mass General Brigham

Mass General Brigham

399 Revolution Dr, Somerville, 02145, US

Last Update: 03/09/2026

View Profile
743/1000Moderate

Mass General Brigham is an integrated academic health care system, uniting great minds to solve the hardest problems in medicine for our communities and the world. Mass General Brigham connects a full continuum of care across a system of academic medical centers, commun...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:18,417
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Superb Shifts

Superb Shifts

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mass General Brigham

Mass General Brigham

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Superb Shifts has 29.08% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mass General Brigham in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Superb Shifts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Superb Shifts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mass General Brigham (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mass General Brigham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Superb Shifts

Superb Shifts

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SUP1785782369
Mass General Brigham

Mass General Brigham

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAS548072825
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAS844072325

FAQ

Between Superb Shifts company and Mass General Brigham company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Superb Shifts company and Mass General Brigham company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Superb Shifts company and Mass General Brigham company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Superb Shifts company and Mass General Brigham company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Superb Shifts company and Mass General Brigham company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Superb Shifts company and Mass General Brigham company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Superb Shifts company and Mass General Brigham company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Superb Shifts company and Mass General Brigham company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Superb Shifts company and Mass General Brigham company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Superb Shifts company and Mass General Brigham company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Superb Shifts company and Mass General Brigham company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Superb Shifts and Mass General Brigham, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Superb Shifts and Mass General Brigham, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Superb Shifts or Mass General Brigham ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Superb Shifts or Mass General Brigham ?
Between Superb Shifts and Mass General Brigham, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Superb Shifts and Mass General Brigham, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA