Comparison Overview
Sunshine Insurance Group

Sunshine Insurance Group
朝外大街, 朝阳区, 100020, CN
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Established in July 2005, Sunshine Insurance Group has experienced sustainable development, now ranking among the Top 7 insurance groups in China, with an annual business income of $12.6 billion in 2016. Sunshine is composed of Property and Casualty Insurance, Life Insu...

Porto
Avenida Rio Branco, 1489, Sao Paulo, SP, BR, 01205-001
Last Update: 19/05/2026
A Porto é mais que uma seguradora, é um ecossistema de soluções de serviços de proteção com tecnologia embarcada, para melhorar e facilitar a experiência do cliente. Com mais de 70 anos de mercado, a atuação da companhia se concentra hoje em quatro pilares estratégicos ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Sunshine Insurance Group







Porto






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sunshine Insurance Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Porto in 2026.
Incident History - Sunshine Insurance Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sunshine Insurance Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Porto (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Porto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Sunshine Insurance Group

Porto
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.