Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SunPower CorporationSunPower Corporation
VS
ENGIE Solutions FranceENGIE Solutions France
SunPower Corporation

SunPower Corporation

1403 N 630 E, None, Orem, Utah, US, 84097

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://us.sunpower.com
748/1000Moderate

We believe clean energy and backup storage should be accessible to everyone. That’s why SunPower offers all-in-one residential solar and storage solutions. With years of dedicated solar experience, we’re working to change the way the world is powered. Have questions or...

NAICS:541391
NAICS Definition:Professional Services
Employees:3,471
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
ENGIE Solutions France

ENGIE Solutions France

1 Place Samuel de Champlain, Courbevoie, 92400, FR

Last Update: 16/09/2026

View Profile
777/1000Fair

ENGIE Solutions, l'allié de confiance des entreprises, des industries et des collectivités engagées dans la neutralité carbone. Grâce à la pluralité de nos compétences, de nos capacités et de nos champs d’intervention, nous sommes en mesure d’offrir des solutions glob...

NAICS:541391
NAICS Definition:Professional Services
Employees:12,334
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SunPower Corporation

SunPower Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ENGIE Solutions France

ENGIE Solutions France

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Services for Renewable Energy Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SunPower Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Services for Renewable Energy Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ENGIE Solutions France in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SunPower Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SunPower Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ENGIE Solutions France (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ENGIE Solutions France cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SunPower Corporation

SunPower Corporation

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SUN457090325
ENGIE Solutions France

ENGIE Solutions France

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SunPower Corporation company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SunPower Corporation company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SunPower Corporation company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SunPower Corporation company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SunPower Corporation company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SunPower Corporation company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SunPower Corporation company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SunPower Corporation company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SunPower Corporation company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SunPower Corporation company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SunPower Corporation company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SunPower Corporation and ENGIE Solutions France, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SunPower Corporation and ENGIE Solutions France, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SunPower Corporation or ENGIE Solutions France ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SunPower Corporation or ENGIE Solutions France ?
Between SunPower Corporation and ENGIE Solutions France, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SunPower Corporation and ENGIE Solutions France, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-110873
SUMMARY

Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-110872
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-110871
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-110870
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-110869
SUMMARY

Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9