Comparison Overview
Sungrow

Sungrow
No.1699 Xiyou Rd., High-tech Industry Development Zone, Hefei, China, Hefei, Anhui, CN, 230088
Last Update: 08/10/2026
Founded in 1997, Sungrow Power Supply Co., Ltd. is a leading global renewable energy company specializing in the R&D, production, sales, and services of renewable energy equipment. Sungrow operates in more than 100 countries and regions worldwide, with 20+ internationa...

Vestas
Hedeager 42, Aarhus, DK, 8200
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Vestas is the energy industry’s global partner on sustainable energy solutions. We design, manufacture, install, and service wind turbines across the globe, and with +200 GW of wind turbines in 88 countries, we have installed more wind power than anyone else. Through o...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Sungrow







Vestas






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Renewable Energy Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Sungrow has 0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Renewable Energy Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Vestas in 2026.
Incident History - Sungrow (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sungrow cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Vestas (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Vestas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Sungrow

Vestas
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.