Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sumitomo Electric LightwaveSumitomo Electric Lightwave
VS
Tata CommunicationsTata Communications
Sumitomo Electric Lightwave

Sumitomo Electric Lightwave

201 South Rogers Lane, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC, US, 27610

Last Update: 08/02/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Sumitomo Electric Lightwave (SEL) creates advanced optical fiber solutions for the future of communication networks. We are at the forefront of the connected world - always innovating and empowering our customers through technology. Our fiber optic products, services, a...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:141
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tata Communications

Tata Communications

Tata Communications Ltd, Mumbai, 400070, IN

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
768/1000Fair

Tata Communications is a digital ecosystem enabler that powers today’s fast-growing digital economy. We enable the digital transformation of enterprises globally, including 300 of the Fortune 500. We carry around 30% of the world’s internet routes and connects businesse...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:16,856
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sumitomo Electric Lightwave

Sumitomo Electric Lightwave

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tata Communications

Tata Communications

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sumitomo Electric Lightwave in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Communications in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sumitomo Electric Lightwave (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sumitomo Electric Lightwave cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tata Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sumitomo Electric Lightwave

Sumitomo Electric Lightwave

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tata Communications

Tata Communications

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sumitomo Electric Lightwave company and Tata Communications company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Lightwave company and Tata Communications company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Lightwave company and Tata Communications company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Lightwave company and Tata Communications company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Lightwave company and Tata Communications company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Lightwave company and Tata Communications company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Lightwave company and Tata Communications company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Lightwave company and Tata Communications company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Lightwave company and Tata Communications company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Lightwave company and Tata Communications company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Lightwave company and Tata Communications company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Lightwave and Tata Communications, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Lightwave and Tata Communications, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sumitomo Electric Lightwave or Tata Communications ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sumitomo Electric Lightwave or Tata Communications ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Lightwave and Tata Communications, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Lightwave and Tata Communications, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA