Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sumitomo Electric CarbideSumitomo Electric Carbide
VS
WärtsiläWärtsilä
Sumitomo Electric Carbide

Sumitomo Electric Carbide

1001 E Business Center Drive, None, Mount Prospect, Illinois, US, 60056

Last Update: 01/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.sumicarbide.com
746/1000Moderate

For 40 years in the United States, we've made it our mission to design and produce exceptionally innovative and advanced cutting tool solutions. Our aggressive R&D and design ingenuity give you more choices in turning systems, drilling systems, milling systems and inser...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:228
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Wärtsilä

Wärtsilä

Hiililaiturinkuja 2, Helsinki, 00180, FI

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.wartsila.com
788/1000Fair

We enable sustainable societies through innovation in technology and services together with all our stakeholders – today and tomorrow. We emphasise innovation in sustainable technology and services to help our customers continuously improve environmental and economic p...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:16,129
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sumitomo Electric Carbide

Sumitomo Electric Carbide

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Wärtsilä

Wärtsilä

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sumitomo Electric Carbide in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wärtsilä in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sumitomo Electric Carbide (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sumitomo Electric Carbide cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Wärtsilä (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wärtsilä cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sumitomo Electric Carbide

Sumitomo Electric Carbide

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Wärtsilä

Wärtsilä

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sumitomo Electric Carbide company and Wärtsilä company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Carbide company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Carbide company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Carbide company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Carbide company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Carbide company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Carbide company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Carbide company and Wärtsilä company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Carbide company and Wärtsilä company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Carbide company and Wärtsilä company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Carbide company and Wärtsilä company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Carbide and Wärtsilä, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Carbide and Wärtsilä, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sumitomo Electric Carbide or Wärtsilä ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sumitomo Electric Carbide or Wärtsilä ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Carbide and Wärtsilä, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sumitomo Electric Carbide and Wärtsilä, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1