Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANYSUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY
VS
Grupo EnergisaGrupo Energisa
SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY

SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY

Gulshan Iqbal Block 14, Near Civic Centre, Karachi 75300, Sindh, undefined, PK

Last Update: 15/02/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.ssgc.com.pk
844/1000Good

Pakistan’s leading gas utility company, SSGC delivers natural gas to more than 2.4 million customers in the provinces of Sindh and Baluchistan. The entire system encompasses more than 120 towns and 930 villages that are geographically spread out across different types o...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:1,798
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grupo Energisa

Grupo Energisa

Cataguases, BR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
784/1000Fair

O Grupo Energisa tem na distribuição de energia elétrica a principal base de seu negócio. Com cinco distribuidoras no Brasil, das quais três na região Nordeste (Energisa Sergipe - Distribuidora de Energia S/A nova denominação de Energipe, no Estado de Sergipe, Energisa ...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:11,751
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY

SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo Energisa

Grupo Energisa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Energisa in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo Energisa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Energisa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY

SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grupo Energisa

Grupo Energisa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY company and Grupo Energisa company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY company and Grupo Energisa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY company and Grupo Energisa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY company and Grupo Energisa company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY company and Grupo Energisa company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY company and Grupo Energisa company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY company and Grupo Energisa company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY company and Grupo Energisa company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY company and Grupo Energisa company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY company and Grupo Energisa company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY company and Grupo Energisa company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY and Grupo Energisa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY and Grupo Energisa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY or Grupo Energisa ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY or Grupo Energisa ?
Between SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY and Grupo Energisa, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY and Grupo Energisa, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1