Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sugar Bowl ResortSugar Bowl Resort
VS
BCD TravelBCD Travel
Sugar Bowl Resort

Sugar Bowl Resort

629 Sugar Bowl Rd, None, Norden, California, US, 95724

Last Update: 05/03/2026

View Profile
725/1000Moderate

With four distinct peaks, award-winning guest service, the most annual snowfall in North Lake Tahoe, and the area's most efficient lift system per acre, Sugar Bowl Resort serves up some of the finest skiing and riding in the region. Sugar Bowl is the closest major Tahoe...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:227
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
BCD Travel

BCD Travel

Europalaan 300, Utrecht, NL, 3526 KS

Last Update: 04/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.bcdtravel.com
721/1000Moderate

BCD Travel helps companies travel smart and achieve more. We drive program adoption, cost savings and talent retention through digital experiences that simplify business travel. Our 15,000+ dedicated team members service clients in 170+ countries as we shape a sustainab...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:16,649
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sugar Bowl Resort

Sugar Bowl Resort

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BCD Travel

BCD Travel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sugar Bowl Resort in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

BCD Travel has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Sugar Bowl Resort (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sugar Bowl Resort cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BCD Travel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BCD Travel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sugar Bowl Resort

Sugar Bowl Resort

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SUG733072725
BCD Travel

BCD Travel

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BCD1780576089
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
BCD528072625

FAQ

Between Sugar Bowl Resort company and BCD Travel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sugar Bowl Resort company and BCD Travel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sugar Bowl Resort company and BCD Travel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sugar Bowl Resort company and BCD Travel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sugar Bowl Resort company and BCD Travel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sugar Bowl Resort company and BCD Travel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sugar Bowl Resort company and BCD Travel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sugar Bowl Resort company and BCD Travel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sugar Bowl Resort company and BCD Travel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sugar Bowl Resort company and BCD Travel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sugar Bowl Resort company and BCD Travel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sugar Bowl Resort and BCD Travel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sugar Bowl Resort and BCD Travel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sugar Bowl Resort or BCD Travel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sugar Bowl Resort or BCD Travel ?
Between Sugar Bowl Resort and BCD Travel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sugar Bowl Resort and BCD Travel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA