Comparison Overview
Sugar Bowl Resort

Sugar Bowl Resort
629 Sugar Bowl Rd, None, Norden, California, US, 95724
Last Update: 05/03/2026
With four distinct peaks, award-winning guest service, the most annual snowfall in North Lake Tahoe, and the area's most efficient lift system per acre, Sugar Bowl Resort serves up some of the finest skiing and riding in the region. Sugar Bowl is the closest major Tahoe...

BCD Travel
Europalaan 300, Utrecht, NL, 3526 KS
Last Update: 04/06/2026
BCD Travel helps companies travel smart and achieve more. We drive program adoption, cost savings and talent retention through digital experiences that simplify business travel. Our 15,000+ dedicated team members service clients in 170+ countries as we shape a sustainab...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Sugar Bowl Resort







BCD Travel






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sugar Bowl Resort in 2026.
Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)
BCD Travel has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Sugar Bowl Resort (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sugar Bowl Resort cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - BCD Travel (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BCD Travel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Sugar Bowl Resort

BCD Travel
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.