Comparison Overview
StylemixThemes

StylemixThemes
Building 5, Dubai Media City, Dubai, UAE, VD-G00-187, Dubai, Dubai, AE, 72280
Last Update: 29/03/2026
“Stylemix” was established in 2007. We specialize on creating awesome WordPress themes with custom design and flexible admin panel. We know that everyone deserves high quality services – no matter if you own a small private business or a large corporation, you must rece...

Infinite Computer Solutions
Tower Oaks Blvd, #700, Rockville, Maryland, US, 20852
Last Update: 17/06/2026
Infinite is a global leader in technology modernization, next-gen IT services and solutions, and digital engineering, with over two decades of experience helping clients turn digital transformation into business value. Leveraging an AI-first approach, we combine leading...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

StylemixThemes







Infinite Computer Solutions






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for StylemixThemes in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
Infinite Computer Solutions has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - StylemixThemes (X = Date, Y = Severity)
StylemixThemes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Infinite Computer Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Infinite Computer Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

StylemixThemes

Infinite Computer Solutions
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.