Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Studio GoboStudio Gobo
VS
Epic GamesEpic Games
Studio Gobo

Studio Gobo

Unit 8, Hove Business Centre, Brighton, East Sussex, BN3 6HA, GB

Last Update: 05/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.studiogobo.com
753/1000Fair

Studio Gobo is renowned for working on acclaimed and award winning games and with the very best publishers and game creators. The team at Gobo have worked on some of the biggest IP’s in the world including, Lego Horizon Adventures, Hogwarts Legacy, Star Wars, Guardians ...

NAICS:51126
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:138
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Epic Games

Epic Games

Cary, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.epicgames.com/
718/1000Moderate

Founded in 1991, Epic Games is a leading interactive entertainment company and provider of 3D engine technology. Epic operates Fortnite, one of the world’s largest games with over 350 million accounts and 2.5 billion friend connections. Epic also develops Unreal Engine,...

NAICS:51126
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:11,921
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Studio Gobo

Studio Gobo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Epic Games

Epic Games

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Games Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio Gobo in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer Games Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Epic Games in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Studio Gobo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio Gobo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Epic Games (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Epic Games cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Studio Gobo

Studio Gobo

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Epic Games

Epic Games

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
EPI601061625
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
EPI32022123
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
EPI2054291023

FAQ

Between Studio Gobo company and Epic Games company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Studio Gobo company and Epic Games company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Studio Gobo company and Epic Games company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Studio Gobo company and Epic Games company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Studio Gobo company and Epic Games company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Studio Gobo company and Epic Games company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Studio Gobo company and Epic Games company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Studio Gobo company and Epic Games company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Studio Gobo company and Epic Games company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Studio Gobo company and Epic Games company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Studio Gobo company and Epic Games company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Studio Gobo and Epic Games, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Studio Gobo and Epic Games, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Studio Gobo or Epic Games ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Studio Gobo or Epic Games ?
Between Studio Gobo and Epic Games, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Studio Gobo and Epic Games, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA