Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

STRUKTURASTRUKTURA
VS
DoorDashDoorDash
STRUKTURA

STRUKTURA

Kyiv, UA

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://struktura.io/
600/1000Poor

We invent, develop, launch, promote and maintain multiple B2C SaaS & Mobile Apps.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:104
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
DoorDash

DoorDash

San Francisco, California, US

Last Update: 09/07/2026

View Profile
628/1000Poor

At DoorDash, our mission to empower local economies shapes how our team members move quickly and always learn and reiterate to support merchants, Dashers and the communities we serve. We are a technology and logistics company that started with door-to-door delivery, and...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:76,630
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
STRUKTURA

STRUKTURA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DoorDash

DoorDash

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

STRUKTURA has 88.68% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

DoorDash has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - STRUKTURA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STRUKTURA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DoorDash (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DoorDash cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
STRUKTURA

STRUKTURA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
RETMSPMUKUMO1770688652
🔒 Incident : Breach
STR1770725180
DoorDash

DoorDash

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
WOFAUBWALDOO1772749980
🔒 Incident : Breach
DOO5993759111725
🔒 Incident : Breach
DOO4104241112725

FAQ

Between STRUKTURA company and DoorDash company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between STRUKTURA company and DoorDash company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between STRUKTURA company and DoorDash company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between STRUKTURA company and DoorDash company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between STRUKTURA company and DoorDash company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between STRUKTURA company and DoorDash company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between STRUKTURA company and DoorDash company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between STRUKTURA company and DoorDash company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between STRUKTURA company and DoorDash company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between STRUKTURA company and DoorDash company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between STRUKTURA company and DoorDash company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between STRUKTURA and DoorDash, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between STRUKTURA and DoorDash, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - STRUKTURA or DoorDash ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - STRUKTURA or DoorDash ?
Between STRUKTURA and DoorDash, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between STRUKTURA and DoorDash, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-77648
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Glance through 32.0.0, the /v2/tasks API accepts type=import tasks that bypass import_filtering_opts, allowing an admin to fetch internal URLs from the Glance service network (aka SSRF), as long as https:// or http:// is used. This API has been available only to admins since Xena, and it has been deprecated for several releases.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.7
CVE-2026-77647
SUMMARY

SPIP before 4.4.20 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, as exploited in the wild in August 2026. This is related to incorrect identification of <?php blocks, and var_export's mishandling of certain cases such as presence of a '<' character.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-77113
SUMMARY

Path traversal in apport-unpack in Canonical Apport before 2.36.0, 2.34.2, and 2.28.4 on Linux allows an attacker to create or overwrite arbitrary files with the privileges of the executing user via an attacker controlled key names in crash report files.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-77646
SUMMARY

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill PDMLink and PTC FlexPLM. The vulnerability may be exploited through the deserialization of untrusted data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:U/V:D/RE:M/U:Red
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-77645
SUMMARY

A critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill and PTC FlexPLM. The vulnerability may be exploited through the deserialization of untrusted data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Red
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA