Comparison Overview
Stronger U Nutrition

Stronger U Nutrition
111 Weir Dr, Woodbury, Minnesota, 55125, US
Last Update: 09/04/2026
Stronger U, the industry leader in macronutrient-based accountability coaching, was founded in 2015 by Mike Doehla with a cell phone, one coach, and the goal of creating a better way to lose weight. Since then, Stronger U has grown to serve over 50,000 members around ...

Purpose Brands, LLC
111 Weir Drive, Woodbury, 55125, US
Last Update: 05/09/2026
Purpose Brands, LLC provides fitness, nutrition and wellness support and services to more than 7,000 communities and millions of people around the world. We own and operate the world’s largest and most trusted portfolio of fitness, health and wellness franchise brand...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Stronger U Nutrition







Purpose Brands, LLC






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Stronger U Nutrition in 2026.
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Purpose Brands, LLC in 2026.
Incident History - Stronger U Nutrition (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Stronger U Nutrition cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Purpose Brands, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Purpose Brands, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Stronger U Nutrition

Purpose Brands, LLC
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.