Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Strix Group plcStrix Group plc
VS
HARMAN InternationalHARMAN International
Strix Group plc

Strix Group plc

N/A

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.strixplc.com/
749/1000Moderate

Strix Group Plc (Strix) is a global leader in the design, manufacture and supply of kettle safety controls and other components and devices involving water heating and temperature control, steam management and water filtration. Strix has sold over 1.9 billion units, an...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:29
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
HARMAN International

HARMAN International

400 Atlantic St, Stamford, 06901, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.harman.com
796/1000Fair

Headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, HARMAN (harman.com) designs and engineers connected products and solutions for automakers, consumers, and enterprises worldwide, including connected car systems, audio and visual products, enterprise automation solutions; and serv...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:28,758
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Strix Group plc

Strix Group plc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
HARMAN International

HARMAN International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Strix Group plc in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HARMAN International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Strix Group plc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Strix Group plc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - HARMAN International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HARMAN International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Strix Group plc

Strix Group plc

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STR23254322
HARMAN International

HARMAN International

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Strix Group plc company and HARMAN International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Strix Group plc company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Strix Group plc company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Strix Group plc company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Strix Group plc company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Strix Group plc company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Strix Group plc company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Strix Group plc company and HARMAN International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Strix Group plc company and HARMAN International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Strix Group plc company and HARMAN International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Strix Group plc company and HARMAN International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Strix Group plc and HARMAN International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Strix Group plc and HARMAN International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Strix Group plc or HARMAN International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Strix Group plc or HARMAN International ?
Between Strix Group plc and HARMAN International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Strix Group plc and HARMAN International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8