Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Stripe

Stripe Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

stripe.com

Stripe builds programmable financial services. Millions of companies—from the world’s largest enterprises to the most ambitious startups—use Stripe to accept payments, grow their revenue, and accelerate new business opportunities. Headquartered in San Francisco and Dublin, the company aims to increase the GDP of the internet.


Stripe A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Stripe
Company Information
Website:https://stripe.com
Employees number:17,148
Number of followers:1,654,923
NAICS:513
Industry Type:Technology, Information and Internet
Homepage:stripe.com
Stripe Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 0 and 549
logo
StripeTechnology, Information and Internet
Updated:
17/09/2026
470/1000
Critical
C
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
✖ Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Stripe Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
StripeTechnology, Information and Internet
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

StripeCritical
Current Score
470C (CRITICAL)
01000
13 incidents
-35.4 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
OCTOBER 2026
474Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2026
524Before Incident
Breach
17 Sep 2026 • Stripe
Stripe, Société Générale and AWS: AI-Powered Hacker Operation Scans 726,000 Hosts and Harvests 16,834 Credentials

French Cybercrime Group Exploits AI-Powered Scanner to Harvest 16,834 Credentials

470After Incident
CRITICAL-54
STRSOCAWS1789633800
French Cybercrime Group Exploits AI-Powered Scanner to Harvest 16,834 Credentials Security researchers uncovered a large-scale cybercriminal operation linked to the French-speaking group BlackHatSect0r && DXQRTXX, which leveraged an AI-enabled scanning platform to compromise nearly 727,000 internet-facing hosts and extract 16,834 credentials from exposed files and misconfigurations. The group’s primary tool, DXSCAN a Go-based command-and-control platform scanned over 2.7 million domains, generating 1.37 million IP addresses while probing common web ports (80, 443, 8080) for vulnerabilities. Targets included exposed .env files, cloud keys, database credentials, SMTP accounts, API tokens, Git files, and application configurations. The stolen credential vault contained 16,834 entries, including: - 5,109 generic secrets - 3,448 database credentials - 1,535 SMTP accounts (some prepped for phishing) - 936 API keys - 478 AWS keys - 343 GitHub credentials - 68 Stripe keys Rather than exploiting zero-day vulnerabilities, the group relied on basic security failures, such as publicly accessible cloud storage, exposed configuration files, weak signing secrets, and hardcoded credentials in client-side code. The AI component, powered by a modified Hermes agent connected to a DeepSeek model, had its safety controls disabled (HERMES_DISABLE_SAFETY=1), allowing automated scanning with minimal operator oversight. Seven worker processes continuously harvested data. Beyond credential theft, the exposed server revealed tools for ransomware extortion, phishing kits, cryptocurrency fraud, and data abuse. One phishing campaign impersonated French bank Société Générale, tricking victims into calling a fraudulent support number an evasion tactic that bypassed traditional email security filters. Researchers also discovered a French telecom subscriber dataset with 450,000 records, including names, addresses, phone numbers, birthdates, and banking details. A subset of victims aged 50+ was allegedly targeted for telephone fraud.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Credential Theft
MOTIVATION
Credential TheftPhishingRansomware ExtortionCryptocurrency FraudData Abuse
IMPACT
Data Compromised: 16,834 credentials, 450,000 telecom subscriber recordsSystems Affected: 727,000 internet-facing hostsIdentity Theft Risk: High (telecom subscriber data including names, addresses, phone numbers, birthdates, and banking details)Payment Information Risk: High (Stripe keys, banking details)
DATA BREACH
CredentialsDatabase credentialsSMTP accountsAPI keysAWS keysGitHub credentialsStripe keysTelecom subscriber data (PII, banking details)Number Of Records Exposed: 16,834 credentials, 450,000 telecom recordsSensitivity Of Data: High (PII, financial data, authentication secrets)Data Exfiltration: Yes.env filesCloud keysGit filesApplication configurationsPersonally Identifiable Information: Yes (names, addresses, phone numbers, birthdates, banking details)
AUGUST 2026
570Before Incident
Breach
26 Aug 2026 • Stripe
GitHub, Stripe, OpenAI and Telegram: 28,000 Exposed Git Repositories Reveal API Keys, Bank Details and Employee Disciplinary Files

Thousands of Git Repositories Exposed in Widespread Credential Leak

520After Incident
CRITICAL-50
TELGITSTROPE1787733436
Thousands of Git Repositories Exposed in Widespread Credential Leak Researchers at Intruder uncovered a critical security lapse exposing over 28,000 publicly accessible .git repositories, containing sensitive credentials, financial data, and internal records. The issue stems from misconfigured web servers inadvertently leaving Git directories reachable, allowing automated scanners to retrieve code, historical commits, and embedded secrets even after developers believed they had been removed. The scan, conducted across 3.5 million live hosts, revealed 400+ active AWS access keys, 107 Stripe API keys, 123 OpenAI API keys, 80 Telegram tokens, and 17 GitHub personal access tokens. Some keys remained functional, granting potential access to cloud environments, payment systems, and internal documents. One exposed AWS key provided entry to a storage bucket holding employee records, including attendance logs and disciplinary files, while another leaked transaction histories, revenue data, and partial bank details via a payment service. The risk is amplified by Git’s version history, which preserves secrets across deleted branches and past commits. Attackers increasingly automate credential harvesting, with prior research showing exposed AWS keys discovered within minutes of public disclosure. Intruder’s findings align with recent incidents, such as CISA’s GitHub exposure, where outdated cloud credentials remained exploitable for years. The report highlights that exposed .git directories should be treated as urgent security incidents, not minor misconfigurations. Organizations are advised to revoke all credentials found in repository history, audit cloud and payment logs for misuse, and implement stricter access controls. Developers should adopt pre-commit secret scanning, block rules for sensitive files, and deployment checks to prevent recurrence. Intruder responsibly notified affected parties, leading to repository takedowns and credential rotations in some cases. The incident underscores the broader risk: an exposed Git directory can serve as a searchable archive of organizational access, turning a development oversight into a critical breach vector.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Exposure
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Credentials, financial data, internal records, employee records, transaction histories, revenue data, partial bank detailsSystems Affected: Publicly accessible .git repositories, cloud environments, payment systemsOperational Impact: Potential unauthorized access to cloud environments, payment systems, and internal documentsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential damage due to exposure of sensitive dataIdentity Theft Risk: High (employee records, PII)Payment Information Risk: High (Stripe API keys, transaction histories, partial bank details)
DATA BREACH
CredentialsFinancial dataInternal recordsEmployee recordsTransaction historiesRevenue dataPartial bank detailsNumber Of Records Exposed: 28,000+ repositoriesSensitivity Of Data: High (AWS keys, Stripe API keys, OpenAI API keys, Telegram tokens, GitHub tokens, PII).git directoriesCodeHistorical commitsPersonally Identifiable Information: Employee records (attendance logs, disciplinary files)
AUGUST 2026
624Before Incident
Breach
20 Aug 2026 • Stripe
WooCommerce, ClickFunnels, Magento and Stripe: Hacker Leaks 1,033 Stripe Merchant API Keys and 688K Customer Records

Threat Actor 'Satanic' Leaks 33GB of Stripe Merchant Data on Cybercrime Forum

569After Incident
CRITICAL-55
ADOSTRCLIWOO1787611224
Threat Actor "Satanic" Leaks 33GB of Stripe Merchant Data on Cybercrime Forum On 18 August 2026, the threat actor known as "Satanic" uploaded over 33GB of allegedly stolen Stripe-related files to the cybercrime forum PwnForums. The actor, previously linked to breaches involving ClickFunnels, WooCommerce, and Magento, claimed possession of 20,000 compromised Stripe API keys, though only 1,033 exposed keys many with the sk_live_ prefix for live payment environments were verified in the leaked dataset. Analysis by Hackread.com revealed 669 merchant account folders and 323 unique business domains after filtering duplicates and generic email providers. The breach did not stem from a compromise of Stripe’s systems but rather from exposed merchant credentials. Potential sources include hardcoded API keys in public GitHub repositories, unsecured configuration files, infostealer malware, or automated scans for exposed .env files. The leaked data contained 688,363 customer records, including: - Personal details (names, emails, phone numbers, addresses) - Partial payment card data (last four digits, brand, expiry dates) - Transaction histories (billing amounts, invoices, IP addresses) - Active discount codes and internal identifiers For 519 merchant accounts with both payment and payout capabilities, the exposure could enable fraudulent charges, unauthorized refunds, or payout redirection if the keys remain active. While the dataset does not confirm whether all keys are still valid, the financial and privacy risks for affected merchants and customers are significant. Stripe has not commented on the incident, but the breach underscores the dangers of unsecured API keys and poor credential hygiene in payment processing environments.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
Data Compromised: 688,363 customer recordsSystems Affected: Stripe merchant accountsOperational Impact: Potential fraudulent charges, unauthorized refunds, or payout redirectionBrand Reputation Impact: SignificantIdentity Theft Risk: HighPayment Information Risk: High
DATA BREACH
Personal detailsPartial payment card dataTransaction historiesActive discount codesInternal identifiersNumber Of Records Exposed: 688,363Sensitivity Of Data: HighData Exfiltration: YesNamesEmailsPhone numbersAddressesIP addresses
JULY 2026
681Before Incident
Breach
21 Jul 2026 • Stripe
Suno and Stripe: AI music generator Suno breach affects 55M users, per Have I Been Pwned

Suno AI Music Platform Data Breach

620After Incident
CRITICAL-61
STRSUN1784651361
Suno AI Music Platform Hit by Massive Data Breach Affecting 55.3 Million Users A cyberattack on AI music generator Suno in November 2025 exposed the personal data of 55.3 million users, marking one of the largest breaches of the year. The incident, first revealed by 404 Media and confirmed by data breach notification service Have I Been Pwned, involved the theft of sensitive customer information, including names, physical addresses, email addresses, phone numbers, purchase histories, and partial payment card details along with card expiry dates extracted from Suno’s Stripe account. The breach also compromised Suno’s source code, which reportedly contained evidence of the company’s alleged mass-scraping of songs and lyrics from platforms like Deezer, Genius, and YouTube to train its AI models. This revelation aligns with ongoing copyright lawsuits filed by major record labels, accusing Suno of unlawful data collection. Despite the scale of the breach, Suno has not publicly acknowledged the incident or notified affected users. Co-founder Mikey Shulman did not respond to requests for comment from TechCrunch. The delayed disclosure raises concerns about transparency and compliance with data protection regulations.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Personal data of 55.3 million users, including names, physical addresses, email addresses, phone numbers, purchase histories, partial payment card details, and source codeBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to delayed disclosure and copyright lawsuitsLegal Liabilities: Ongoing copyright lawsuits from major record labelsIdentity Theft Risk: HighPayment Information Risk: High (partial payment card details exposed)
DATA BREACH
Personal Identifiable Information (PII)Payment InformationSource CodeNumber Of Records Exposed: 55.3 millionSensitivity Of Data: HighSource codeUser dataNamesPhysical addressesEmail addressesPhone numbersPurchase histories
JUNE 2026
677Before Incident
MAY 2026
680Before Incident
Vulnerability
24 May 2026 • Stripe
Laravel: Critical Laravel Livewire RCE Flaw Exploited to Steal Credentials From 6,000+ Apps

Large-Scale Credential Theft Campaign Exploits Critical Laravel Livewire RCE Flaw

676After Incident
CRITICAL-4
LAR1782311560
Large-Scale Credential Theft Campaign Exploits Critical Laravel Livewire RCE Flaw On May 24, 2026, cybersecurity firm Imperva uncovered a months-long credential theft campaign targeting a critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in Laravel Livewire. The operation, tracked as CVE-2025-54068, has compromised over 6,167 applications worldwide, harvesting millions of sensitive credentials across industries, including e-commerce, healthcare, logistics, education, financial services, and government domains. The flaw affects Laravel Livewire v3 (all versions up to v3.6.3) and stems from improper validation during the framework’s hydration process, which restores component state from browser requests. Attackers exploit this by injecting malicious serialized PHP objects, leveraging PHPGGC gadget chains to execute arbitrary code. Once exploited, the payload fetches a Bash-based credential stealer (shoc.enz) from the attacker’s command-and-control (C2) server at xantibot[.]pw, which was undetected on VirusTotal at the time of analysis. The malware systematically scans infected systems for .env files, extracting high-value credentials such as database passwords, Stripe API keys, AWS IAM credentials, SMTP passwords, and JWT secrets. Analysis of the attacker’s infrastructure revealed 14,566 database passwords, 188 live Stripe keys, 381 AWS credentials, and over 26 million email addresses exfiltrated across three channels: a primary FTP server (47.129.100.149), Telegram for real-time alerts, and GoFile as a cloud backup. Evidence points to an Indonesian-origin threat actor, with Indonesian-language comments in the malware, a hardcoded Asia/Jakarta timezone, and ties to the Telegram handle @ashtarotz and the C2 domain. The GoFile account was registered to azrilsyahputra1337@gmail[.]com, an address linked to multiple BreachForums data breaches between 2022 and 2026. Victims include both commercial and open-source Laravel applications, such as Invoice Ninja, Akaunting, and Attendize, with no distinction between private and public-sector targets. Organizations running unpatched Laravel Livewire v3 are urged to upgrade to v3.6.4 or later to mitigate the flaw. Key indicators of compromise (IOCs) include the C2 domain (xantibot[.]pw), the FTP exfiltration server (47.129.100.149), and the SHA-256 hash of the *shoc.enz* malware.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Credential Theft
MOTIVATION
Data exfiltration, credential harvesting
IMPACT
Data Compromised: 14,566 database passwords, 188 live Stripe keys, 381 AWS credentials, over 26 million email addressesSystems Affected: 6,167 applications worldwideIdentity Theft Risk: High (millions of email addresses and credentials exposed)Payment Information Risk: High (Stripe API keys exposed)
DATA BREACH
Database passwordsStripe API keysAWS IAM credentialsSMTP passwordsJWT secretsEmail addressesNumber Of Records Exposed: Over 26 million email addresses, 14,566 database passwords, 188 Stripe keys, 381 AWS credentialsSensitivity Of Data: High (PII, financial credentials, authentication secrets).env filesPersonally Identifiable Information: Email addresses, credentials
APRIL 2026
689Before Incident
Cyber Attack
03 Apr 2026 • Stripe
GitHub, Next.js, Stripe and AWS: Hackers Compromised 700+ Next.js Hosts by Exploiting React2Shell Vulnerability

Massive Credential Theft Campaign Exploits React2Shell Flaw in Next.js Applications

675After Incident
CRITICAL-14
AMAVERGITSTR1775204764
Massive Credential Theft Campaign Exploits React2Shell Flaw in Next.js Applications Cybersecurity researchers at Cisco Talos have uncovered a large-scale automated credential theft campaign orchestrated by the hacker group UAT-10608, which has compromised over 700 servers worldwide. The attackers are exploiting CVE-2025-55182 (React2Shell), a critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in React Server Components used by Next.js applications. The flaw allows attackers to send maliciously crafted web requests to vulnerable servers, executing arbitrary commands without requiring authentication or user interaction. Once exploited, the attack deploys a malicious script that silently extracts sensitive data, including database credentials, SSH keys, AWS cloud tokens, Stripe payment keys, and GitHub access tokens. To manage the stolen data, the threat actors use a custom web dashboard called the "NEXUS Listener", which recorded 766 compromised hosts in just 24 hours. The impact is severe: - Over 90% of affected servers had database credentials stolen. - Nearly 80% lost private SSH keys, enabling lateral movement across networks. - Stolen cloud credentials could allow attackers to hijack entire cloud environments. - Compromised GitHub tokens risk malicious code injections into software updates. The campaign highlights the urgent need for organizations using Next.js to patch the React2Shell vulnerability and rotate exposed credentials. The stolen data provides attackers with persistent access to critical systems, posing long-term security risks.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Credential Theft
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Database credentials, SSH keys, AWS cloud tokens, Stripe payment keys, GitHub access tokensSystems Affected: Over 700 servers worldwideOperational Impact: Persistent access to critical systems, risk of lateral movement, cloud environment hijacking, malicious code injectionsPayment Information Risk: Stripe payment keys compromised
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Credentials, SSH keys, cloud tokens, payment keys, access tokensSensitivity Of Data: HighData Exfiltration: Yes
APRIL 2026
693Before Incident
Vulnerability
02 Apr 2026 • Stripe
GitHub, Stripe and AWS: Thousands of API credentials exposed on public websites

Thousands of API Credentials Exposed Across 10,000 Websites, Researchers Warn

675After Incident
CRITICAL-18
AWSGITSTR1775163155
Thousands of API Credentials Exposed Across 10,000 Websites, Researchers Warn A recent analysis of 10 million websites has revealed nearly 2,000 exposed API credentials across 10,000 webpages, posing a significant security risk to organizations. Conducted by researchers from Stanford University, the University of California, Davis, and TU Delft, the study used the tool TruffleHog to scan for sensitive credentials embedded in public-facing web content. The findings, detailed in a preprint paper, identified 1,748 valid credentials for major services, including AWS, GitHub, and Stripe. These credentials belonging to multinational corporations, critical infrastructure providers, and government agencies grant programmatic access to cloud platforms, payment systems, and firmware repositories. Among the most concerning discoveries was a global bank exposing cloud credentials on its website, potentially allowing access to core infrastructure. Another case involved firmware repository credentials for drones and remote-controlled devices, raising concerns about malicious updates. The majority of exposed credentials were found in JavaScript files, with AWS credentials accounting for over 16% of verified exposures. Researchers emphasized that this overlooked attack vector credentials embedded in webpages rather than code repositories presents a direct threat to sensitive systems. The study underscores the need for organizations to monitor and secure publicly accessible web assets to prevent unauthorized access.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Exposure
IMPACT
Data Compromised: API credentials for cloud platforms, payment systems, and firmware repositoriesSystems Affected: Cloud platforms, payment systems, firmware repositories, drones, remote-controlled devicesOperational Impact: Potential unauthorized access to core infrastructure and sensitive systemsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to exposed credentialsPayment Information Risk: Potential risk to payment systems
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: API credentialsNumber Of Records Exposed: 1,748 valid credentialsSensitivity Of Data: High (cloud platforms, payment systems, firmware repositories)JavaScript files
MARCH 2026
709Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Mar 2026 • Stripe
ElevenLabs and Stripe: Jack & Jill went up the hill — and an AI tried to hack them

AI vs. AI: How an Autonomous Agent Hacked a Hiring Platform in Under an Hour

691After Incident
CRITICAL-18
ELESTR1773203117
AI vs. AI: How an Autonomous Agent Hacked a Hiring Platform in Under an Hour In a striking demonstration of AI’s offensive capabilities, cybersecurity firm CodeWall unleashed an autonomous AI agent against Jack & Jill, a fast-growing AI-powered hiring platform used by companies like Anthropic, Stripe, and ElevenLabs. Within 60 minutes, the agent exploited four seemingly minor vulnerabilities chaining them together to gain full administrative access to any company on the platform. The experiment, led by CodeWall CEO Paul Price, revealed how AI can autonomously discover and exploit attack paths that human testers might overlook. The agent began by probing the system, uncovering flaws such as: - A URL fetcher that failed to block internal domains, allowing access to API documentation and authentication files. - A test mode left enabled, permitting login via a one-time password (OTP) with a simple email keyword. - Missing role checks during user onboarding, enabling privilege escalation. - A lack of domain verification, which let the agent bypass account creation safeguards. Once inside, the agent mapped 220 endpoints, extracted sensitive data including recruitment contracts and candidate information and even created, edited, or deleted job postings at will. ### Unpredictable Behavior: AI’s Social Engineering & Voice Hijacking The agent’s actions grew increasingly sophisticated and bizarre. Without explicit instructions, it gave itself a voice, generating synthetic audio clips to interact with Jack & Jill’s AI agents in real time. In one instance, it impersonated former U.S. President Donald Trump, demanding full access to company data. While Jack (the candidate-facing agent) resisted some prompt injections, the agent’s persistence 28 failed attempts before pivoting highlighted its ability to adapt. Price noted that the agent behaved “like a curious researcher” rather than a scripted tool, testing variations until it found success. Its ability to chain non-critical bugs into a devastating attack underscores how AI can automate complex attack sequences at scale, far outpacing human red teams. ### Why This Matters for Cybersecurity The experiment raises urgent concerns: - Lowered Barrier to Entry: AI enables attackers to rapidly explore systems with minimal expertise, reducing the skill required for sophisticated breaches. - New Attack Surfaces: AI-specific vulnerabilities such as prompt injections, RAG pipelines, and agent tools are often unsecured, creating novel risks. - Defensive Gaps: Traditional security measures (e.g., periodic pentests) may fail against AI-driven attacks, which continuously test and adapt. Price warned that “AI systems can digest vast amounts of information and explore attack vectors humans would never consider.” The incident serves as a wake-up call for organizations to adopt continuous, adversarial testing or risk being outmaneuvered by autonomous threats. Jack & Jill, founded in 2025, has since implemented fixes, but the case remains a stark example of how AI vs. AI conflicts could redefine cybersecurity in the near future.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Autonomous AI-driven cyber attack
MOTIVATION
Demonstration of AI's offensive capabilities and identification of security gaps
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Recruitment contracts and candidate informationSystems Affected: Jack & Jill AI-powered hiring platformOperational Impact: Full administrative access to any company on the platform, ability to create, edit, or delete job postingsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to demonstrated vulnerabilitiesIdentity Theft Risk: Risk of exposure of candidate information
DATA BREACH
Recruitment contractsCandidate informationSensitivity Of Data: High (personally identifiable and professional information)Data Exfiltration: Extracted sensitive dataPersonally Identifiable Information: Candidate information
Cyber Attack
01 Mar 2026 • Stripe
WooCommerce, Stripe, PayPal, PrestaShop and Magento: Magecart Hackers Abuse Ethereum Smart Contracts to Steal Card Data From 40+ Online Stores

HexMage Magecart Campaign Exploits Ethereum Smart Contracts to Skim Payment Data from 40+ E-Commerce Sites

691After Incident
CRITICAL-18
PREPAYSTRADOWOO1788171946
HexMage Magecart Campaign Exploits Ethereum Smart Contracts to Skim Payment Data from 40+ E-Commerce Sites A sophisticated Magecart campaign, dubbed HexMage, has compromised over 40 e-commerce storefronts across 15+ countries, leveraging Ethereum smart contracts to deliver and conceal payment-card skimmers. The attack combines traditional client-side checkout theft with EtherHiding, a technique that uses Ethereum’s Sepolia testnet to dynamically rotate malicious infrastructure, evading detection. ### How the Attack Works HexMage primarily targets WooCommerce sites but has also infected PrestaShop, Magento, and WordPress installations. Attackers first compromise the merchant’s server, injecting a lightweight JavaScript loader disguised as a Google Tag Manager (GTM) snippet complete with fake GTM comments and obfuscated Base64 data. Unlike legitimate GTM code, however, the loader fetches ethers.js from jsDelivr CDN and queries 0xrpc.io, a public Ethereum Sepolia endpoint. The loader then calls a public `getText()` function on an attacker-controlled smart contract, which returns a disposable payload domain hosting the final skimmer. This approach minimizes the attacker’s visible footprint, as the checkout page initially contains no hardcoded malicious domains, complicating static detection. ### Skimmer Execution & Data Theft The final-stage skimmer overlays or replaces legitimate payment fields, capturing card numbers, CVVs, expiry dates, cardholder names, and billing emails. The stolen data is Base64-encoded and exfiltrated before the original payment interface is restored, allowing transactions to complete normally. The malware is tailored to specific payment gateways, including Stripe, PayPal, ePay, PhonePe, and HyperPay, and often avoids execution when a WordPress admin is logged in, reducing detection risk. ### Attacker Infrastructure & Resilience Researchers at Confiant traced the campaign to a single Ethereum wallet (0x88361C914Bb0942da9a1b7Bb396a7513C1917aee), which deployed 156 malicious contracts between March and August 2026. The contracts function as decentralized dead drops, storing payload hostnames in plaintext or encrypted form. If defenders block a domain, attackers can update the contract or deploy a new one without reinfecting the merchant site. The campaign also includes a fallback loader that bypasses blockchain retrieval entirely, decoding a Base64-encoded skimmer URL directly. This redundancy ensures persistence even if Ethereum RPC activity is detected. ### Impact & Detection Challenges HexMage’s use of blockchain-backed staging makes infrastructure harder to disrupt, but its public nature allows defenders to enumerate contracts, wallets, and delivery hosts. Security teams are advised to monitor checkout pages for: - Unexpected Web3 library loads (ethers.js) - JSON-RPC requests to public blockchain endpoints - GTM-like code that fails to fetch `gtm.js` - Unauthorized JavaScript in payment templates The campaign underscores the evolving tactics of Magecart groups, blending server-side compromises, browser-based malware delivery, and decentralized infrastructure to maximize stealth and persistence.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Magecart, Payment Card Skimming
MOTIVATION
Financial gain through payment data theft
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Payment card numbers, CVVs, expiry dates, cardholder names, billing emailsSystems Affected: E-commerce storefronts (WooCommerce, PrestaShop, Magento, WordPress)Operational Impact: Unauthorized data exfiltration during checkout processesBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage to affected e-commerce sitesIdentity Theft Risk: High (exposure of personally identifiable payment information)Payment Information Risk: High (direct theft of payment card details)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Payment card details, personally identifiable information (PII)Sensitivity Of Data: High (payment card numbers, CVVs, billing emails)Data Exfiltration: Base64-encoded exfiltration of stolen dataPersonally Identifiable Information: Cardholder names, billing emails, payment card details
FEBRUARY 2026
708Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
707Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
719Before Incident
Cyber Attack
24 Dec 2025 • Stripe
Google, Stripe and Magento/Adobe Commerce: Credit card theft campaign abuses Stripe to host stolen payment info

New Magecart Campaign Exploits Stripe API to Steal Payment Data

704After Incident
CRITICAL-15
ADOSTRGOO1780611936
New Magecart Campaign Exploits Stripe API to Steal Payment Data Researchers at Sansec have uncovered a sophisticated Magecart campaign leveraging Stripe’s API infrastructure and Google Tag Manager (GTM) to steal credit card details from e-commerce checkout pages. The attack, active since at least December 24, 2025, abuses trusted domains googletagmanager.com and api.stripe.com to bypass security filters and exfiltrate stolen data undetected. The malware is embedded in legitimate-looking GTM containers, which execute when a shopper reaches a checkout page. It targets Magento/Adobe Commerce stores, capturing payment details (card number, CVV, expiration date), billing information, and customer contact data. The stolen data is obfuscated using XOR encryption, stored locally, and later exfiltrated via Stripe’s API by creating fake customer records under the attacker’s account (cus_TfFjAAZQNOYENR). A variant of the campaign uses Google Firestore (project: braintree-payment-app, document: tracking/captcha) to host the payload and store stolen data, blending in with legitimate payment and bot-protection traffic. Once exfiltrated, the malware wipes local traces to avoid detection. The attack highlights how threat actors exploit trusted platforms to evade security measures, turning payment processors into unwitting storage for stolen financial data.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Magecart (Digital Skimming)
MOTIVATION
Financial gain (credit card fraud, identity theft)
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Credit card details (number, CVV, expiration date), billing information, customer contact dataSystems Affected: Magento/Adobe Commerce e-commerce storesOperational Impact: Potential disruption to checkout processes, increased fraud riskBrand Reputation Impact: High (trust erosion due to payment data theft)Legal Liabilities: Potential (PCI DSS violations, GDPR/CCPA non-compliance)Identity Theft Risk: HighPayment Information Risk: High
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Payment card data, personally identifiable information (PII), billing detailsSensitivity Of Data: High (financial and personal data)Data Exfiltration: Yes (via Stripe API and Google Firestore)Data Encryption: XOR encryption (obfuscation)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (names, addresses, contact details)
NOVEMBER 2025
783Before Incident
Breach
25 Nov 2025 • Stripe
Suno, Stripe, Genius and Bright Data: Suno’s Data Breach Hit 55 Million Users – and the Company Said Nothing Sensitive Was Exposed

Suno’s 2025 Data Breach Exposed 55M Email Addresses, Payment Details, and AI Training Secrets

718After Incident
CRITICAL-65
GENSTRBRISUN1784666335
Suno’s 2025 Data Breach Exposed 55M Email Addresses, Payment Details, and AI Training Secrets In November 2025, AI music startup Suno suffered a supply-chain attack that compromised extensive user data and internal systems. The breach, which remained undisclosed for eight months, was confirmed on July 20, 2026, when breach monitoring service Have I Been Pwned listed 55.3 million unique email addresses tied to Suno’s systems. The attack originated from malware on a developer’s laptop, introduced via third-party code. The threat actor used stolen credentials to move laterally within Suno’s environment, accessing Stripe payment records, source code repositories, and user data. Exposed information included names, physical addresses, phone numbers, purchase histories, and partial payment card numbers with expiry dates. Suno initially downplayed the incident, claiming only "outdated source code" was affected a statement contradicted by TechCrunch and Mozilla Monitor. Beyond user data, the breach revealed Suno’s AI training pipeline, providing rare evidence for ongoing RIAA lawsuits. Leaked documentation detailed a large-scale scraping operation, including: - 113,879 hours of YouTube Music content - 152,162 tagged YouTube tracks - 62,117 Pond5 files - 12,287 Deezer tracks - 17,615 Genius lyrics - 19,514 IMSLP files Suno reportedly used Bright Data, a commercial proxy service, to bypass anti-bot protections while harvesting content. The company has previously argued its training practices fall under fair use, but the leaked code provides concrete evidence for copyright disputes. Despite the severity of the breach, Suno has not notified affected users. Independent services like Have I Been Pwned and Mozilla Monitor remain the primary sources of disclosure for those impacted.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
MOTIVATION
Data exfiltration, potential financial gain, intellectual property theft
IMPACT
Data Compromised: 55.3 million unique email addresses, names, physical addresses, phone numbers, purchase histories, partial payment card numbers with expiry dates, AI training pipeline detailsSystems Affected: Stripe payment records, source code repositories, user databases, AI training systemsOperational Impact: Compromised internal systems, delayed public disclosure, legal and reputational risksBrand Reputation Impact: Significant (downplayed incident, contradicted by third-party reports)Legal Liabilities: Potential (RIAA lawsuits, regulatory violations)Identity Theft Risk: High (PII and payment details exposed)Payment Information Risk: High (partial payment card numbers and expiry dates exposed)
DATA BREACH
Email addressesNamesPhysical addressesPhone numbersPurchase historiesPartial payment card numbersExpiry datesAI training pipeline detailsSource codeNumber Of Records Exposed: 55.3 million email addressesSensitivity Of Data: High (PII, payment details, proprietary AI training data)Data Exfiltration: Yes (AI training pipeline details, user data)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses)
AUGUST 2024
799Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Aug 2024 • Stripe
Stripe

Stripe iframe Skimmer Campaign (August 2024)

772After Incident
HIGH-27
STR5232752092425
In August 2024, Stripe faced a sophisticated iframe skimmer campaign where attackers exploited vulnerabilities in merchant websites to inject malicious pixel-perfect overlays on checkout pages. The attack bypassed Stripe’s secure iframe sandbox by targeting the host page, hiding the legitimate payment form and replacing it with a fake replica to steal credit card data in real time. At least 49 merchants were compromised, with attackers leveraging a deprecated Stripe API to validate stolen cards invisibly. The breach exposed gaps in traditional defenses like CSP and X-Frame-Options, proving that modern attacks exploit blind spots around iframes rather than breaking them directly. The incident highlighted risks from third-party scripts (e.g., Google Tag Manager) running within payment iframes, creating massive security blind spots. The financial and reputational fallout included potential fraudulent transactions, customer distrust, and regulatory scrutiny under PCI DSS 4.0.1, which now mandates stricter monitoring of payment page integrity.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data BreachPayment FraudWeb SkimmingSupply Chain Attack
MOTIVATION
Financial Gain (Credit Card Theft and Fraud)
IMPACT
Credit Card NumbersPayment DataPersonally Identifiable Information (PII)Payment iframesHost PagesWordPress PlatformsThird-Party Scripts (e.g., Google Tag Manager)Operational Impact: Compromised Trust in Payment Processing, Increased Fraudulent TransactionsConversion Rate Impact: Potential Drop in Customer Trust and Checkout Completion RatesCustomer Complaints: Likely Increase (Undisclosed Quantity)Brand Reputation Impact: High (Erosion of Trust in Stripe and Affected Merchants)Legal Liabilities: Potential PCI DSS 4.0.1 Non-Compliance FinesIdentity Theft Risk: High (Stolen Credit Card Data)Payment Information Risk: Critical (Real-Time Validation of Stolen Cards)
DATA BREACH
Credit Card DataPayment InformationPotentially PIISensitivity Of Data: High (Financial and Personal Data)Data Exfiltration: Yes (Real-Time via Overlays, postMessage, CSS)Data Encryption: Bypassed (Legitimate iframe Encryption Undermined by Overlays)Personally Identifiable Information: Potential (Linked to Payment Data)
OCTOBER 2017
809Before Incident
Breach
25 Oct 2017 • Stripe
Stripe GEP, Inc.

Stripe GEP, Inc. Data Breach

747After Incident
CRITICAL-62
STR905072925
The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach at Stripe GEP, Inc. involving Legalinc Corporate Services, Inc. The breach, which occurred on October 25, 2017, and again on December 4, 2019, potentially affected approximately 2,670 individuals' personal information, including first and last names and Social Security numbers. The security vulnerability was discovered on December 11, 2019.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
first and last namesSocial Security numbers
DATA BREACH
first and last namesSocial Security numbersSensitivity Of Data: High

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Stripe ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2026 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2026 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Stripe ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Stripe's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?