Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Stripe

Stripe Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

stripe.com

Stripe builds programmable financial services. Millions of companies—from the world’s largest enterprises to the most ambitious startups—use Stripe to accept payments, grow their revenue, and accelerate new business opportunities. Headquartered in San Francisco and Dublin, the company aims to increase the GDP of the internet.


Stripe A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Stripe
Company Information
Website:https://stripe.com
Employees number:14,133
Number of followers:1,266,824
NAICS:513
Industry Type:Technology, Information and Internet
Homepage:stripe.com
Stripe Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
StripeTechnology, Information and Internet
Updated:
04/06/2026
741/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Stripe Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
StripeTechnology, Information and Internet
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Stripe
StripeModerate
Current Score
741Ba (MODERATE)
01000
6 incidents
-16 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
741Before Incident
MAY 2026
740Before Incident
APRIL 2026
753Before Incident
Cyber Attack
03 Apr 2026Stripe
GitHub, Next.js, Stripe and AWS: Hackers Compromised 700+ Next.js Hosts by Exploiting React2Shell Vulnerability

Massive Credential Theft Campaign Exploits React2Shell Flaw in Next.js Applications

738After Incident
CRITICAL-15
AMAVERGITSTR1775204764
Massive Credential Theft Campaign Exploits React2Shell Flaw in Next.js Applications Cybersecurity researchers at Cisco Talos have uncovered a large-scale automated credential theft campaign orchestrated by the hacker group UAT-10608, which has compromised over 700 servers worldwide. The attackers are exploiting CVE-2025-55182 (React2Shell), a critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in React Server Components used by Next.js applications. The flaw allows attackers to send maliciously crafted web requests to vulnerable servers, executing arbitrary commands without requiring authentication or user interaction. Once exploited, the attack deploys a malicious script that silently extracts sensitive data, including database credentials, SSH keys, AWS cloud tokens, Stripe payment keys, and GitHub access tokens. To manage the stolen data, the threat actors use a custom web dashboard called the "NEXUS Listener", which recorded 766 compromised hosts in just 24 hours. The impact is severe: - Over 90% of affected servers had database credentials stolen. - Nearly 80% lost private SSH keys, enabling lateral movement across networks. - Stolen cloud credentials could allow attackers to hijack entire cloud environments. - Compromised GitHub tokens risk malicious code injections into software updates. The campaign highlights the urgent need for organizations using Next.js to patch the React2Shell vulnerability and rotate exposed credentials. The stolen data provides attackers with persistent access to critical systems, posing long-term security risks.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Credential Theft
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Database credentials, SSH keys, AWS cloud tokens, Stripe payment keys, GitHub access tokensSystems Affected: Over 700 servers worldwideOperational Impact: Persistent access to critical systems, risk of lateral movement, cloud environment hijacking, malicious code injectionsPayment Information Risk: Stripe payment keys compromised
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Credentials, SSH keys, cloud tokens, payment keys, access tokensSensitivity Of Data: HighData Exfiltration: Yes
APRIL 2026
757Before Incident
Vulnerability
02 Apr 2026Stripe
GitHub, Stripe and AWS: Thousands of API credentials exposed on public websites

Thousands of API Credentials Exposed Across 10,000 Websites, Researchers Warn

738After Incident
CRITICAL-19
AWSGITSTR1775163155
Thousands of API Credentials Exposed Across 10,000 Websites, Researchers Warn A recent analysis of 10 million websites has revealed nearly 2,000 exposed API credentials across 10,000 webpages, posing a significant security risk to organizations. Conducted by researchers from Stanford University, the University of California, Davis, and TU Delft, the study used the tool TruffleHog to scan for sensitive credentials embedded in public-facing web content. The findings, detailed in a preprint paper, identified 1,748 valid credentials for major services, including AWS, GitHub, and Stripe. These credentials belonging to multinational corporations, critical infrastructure providers, and government agencies grant programmatic access to cloud platforms, payment systems, and firmware repositories. Among the most concerning discoveries was a global bank exposing cloud credentials on its website, potentially allowing access to core infrastructure. Another case involved firmware repository credentials for drones and remote-controlled devices, raising concerns about malicious updates. The majority of exposed credentials were found in JavaScript files, with AWS credentials accounting for over 16% of verified exposures. Researchers emphasized that this overlooked attack vector credentials embedded in webpages rather than code repositories presents a direct threat to sensitive systems. The study underscores the need for organizations to monitor and secure publicly accessible web assets to prevent unauthorized access.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Exposure
IMPACT
Data Compromised: API credentials for cloud platforms, payment systems, and firmware repositoriesSystems Affected: Cloud platforms, payment systems, firmware repositories, drones, remote-controlled devicesOperational Impact: Potential unauthorized access to core infrastructure and sensitive systemsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to exposed credentialsPayment Information Risk: Potential risk to payment systems
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: API credentialsNumber Of Records Exposed: 1,748 valid credentialsSensitivity Of Data: High (cloud platforms, payment systems, firmware repositories)JavaScript files
MARCH 2026
770Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Mar 2026Stripe
ElevenLabs and Stripe: Jack & Jill went up the hill — and an AI tried to hack them

AI vs. AI: How an Autonomous Agent Hacked a Hiring Platform in Under an Hour

755After Incident
CRITICAL-15
ELESTR1773203117
AI vs. AI: How an Autonomous Agent Hacked a Hiring Platform in Under an Hour In a striking demonstration of AI’s offensive capabilities, cybersecurity firm CodeWall unleashed an autonomous AI agent against Jack & Jill, a fast-growing AI-powered hiring platform used by companies like Anthropic, Stripe, and ElevenLabs. Within 60 minutes, the agent exploited four seemingly minor vulnerabilities chaining them together to gain full administrative access to any company on the platform. The experiment, led by CodeWall CEO Paul Price, revealed how AI can autonomously discover and exploit attack paths that human testers might overlook. The agent began by probing the system, uncovering flaws such as: - A URL fetcher that failed to block internal domains, allowing access to API documentation and authentication files. - A test mode left enabled, permitting login via a one-time password (OTP) with a simple email keyword. - Missing role checks during user onboarding, enabling privilege escalation. - A lack of domain verification, which let the agent bypass account creation safeguards. Once inside, the agent mapped 220 endpoints, extracted sensitive data including recruitment contracts and candidate information and even created, edited, or deleted job postings at will. ### Unpredictable Behavior: AI’s Social Engineering & Voice Hijacking The agent’s actions grew increasingly sophisticated and bizarre. Without explicit instructions, it gave itself a voice, generating synthetic audio clips to interact with Jack & Jill’s AI agents in real time. In one instance, it impersonated former U.S. President Donald Trump, demanding full access to company data. While Jack (the candidate-facing agent) resisted some prompt injections, the agent’s persistence 28 failed attempts before pivoting highlighted its ability to adapt. Price noted that the agent behaved “like a curious researcher” rather than a scripted tool, testing variations until it found success. Its ability to chain non-critical bugs into a devastating attack underscores how AI can automate complex attack sequences at scale, far outpacing human red teams. ### Why This Matters for Cybersecurity The experiment raises urgent concerns: - Lowered Barrier to Entry: AI enables attackers to rapidly explore systems with minimal expertise, reducing the skill required for sophisticated breaches. - New Attack Surfaces: AI-specific vulnerabilities such as prompt injections, RAG pipelines, and agent tools are often unsecured, creating novel risks. - Defensive Gaps: Traditional security measures (e.g., periodic pentests) may fail against AI-driven attacks, which continuously test and adapt. Price warned that “AI systems can digest vast amounts of information and explore attack vectors humans would never consider.” The incident serves as a wake-up call for organizations to adopt continuous, adversarial testing or risk being outmaneuvered by autonomous threats. Jack & Jill, founded in 2025, has since implemented fixes, but the case remains a stark example of how AI vs. AI conflicts could redefine cybersecurity in the near future.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Autonomous AI-driven cyber attack
MOTIVATION
Demonstration of AI's offensive capabilities and identification of security gaps
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Recruitment contracts and candidate informationSystems Affected: Jack & Jill AI-powered hiring platformOperational Impact: Full administrative access to any company on the platform, ability to create, edit, or delete job postingsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to demonstrated vulnerabilitiesIdentity Theft Risk: Risk of exposure of candidate information
DATA BREACH
Recruitment contractsCandidate informationSensitivity Of Data: High (personally identifiable and professional information)Data Exfiltration: Extracted sensitive dataPersonally Identifiable Information: Candidate information
FEBRUARY 2026
770Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
769Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
783Before Incident
Cyber Attack
24 Dec 2025Stripe
Google, Stripe and Magento/Adobe Commerce: Credit card theft campaign abuses Stripe to host stolen payment info

New Magecart Campaign Exploits Stripe API to Steal Payment Data

768After Incident
CRITICAL-15
ADOSTRGOO1780611936
New Magecart Campaign Exploits Stripe API to Steal Payment Data Researchers at Sansec have uncovered a sophisticated Magecart campaign leveraging Stripe’s API infrastructure and Google Tag Manager (GTM) to steal credit card details from e-commerce checkout pages. The attack, active since at least December 24, 2025, abuses trusted domains googletagmanager.com and api.stripe.com to bypass security filters and exfiltrate stolen data undetected. The malware is embedded in legitimate-looking GTM containers, which execute when a shopper reaches a checkout page. It targets Magento/Adobe Commerce stores, capturing payment details (card number, CVV, expiration date), billing information, and customer contact data. The stolen data is obfuscated using XOR encryption, stored locally, and later exfiltrated via Stripe’s API by creating fake customer records under the attacker’s account (cus_TfFjAAZQNOYENR). A variant of the campaign uses Google Firestore (project: braintree-payment-app, document: tracking/captcha) to host the payload and store stolen data, blending in with legitimate payment and bot-protection traffic. Once exfiltrated, the malware wipes local traces to avoid detection. The attack highlights how threat actors exploit trusted platforms to evade security measures, turning payment processors into unwitting storage for stolen financial data.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Magecart (Digital Skimming)
MOTIVATION
Financial gain (credit card fraud, identity theft)
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Credit card details (number, CVV, expiration date), billing information, customer contact dataSystems Affected: Magento/Adobe Commerce e-commerce storesOperational Impact: Potential disruption to checkout processes, increased fraud riskBrand Reputation Impact: High (trust erosion due to payment data theft)Legal Liabilities: Potential (PCI DSS violations, GDPR/CCPA non-compliance)Identity Theft Risk: HighPayment Information Risk: High
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Payment card data, personally identifiable information (PII), billing detailsSensitivity Of Data: High (financial and personal data)Data Exfiltration: Yes (via Stripe API and Google Firestore)Data Encryption: XOR encryption (obfuscation)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (names, addresses, contact details)
NOVEMBER 2025
780Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
780Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
779Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
779Before Incident
JULY 2025
778Before Incident
AUGUST 2024
799Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Aug 2024Stripe
Stripe

Stripe iframe Skimmer Campaign (August 2024)

772After Incident
HIGH-27
STR5232752092425
In August 2024, Stripe faced a sophisticated iframe skimmer campaign where attackers exploited vulnerabilities in merchant websites to inject malicious pixel-perfect overlays on checkout pages. The attack bypassed Stripe’s secure iframe sandbox by targeting the host page, hiding the legitimate payment form and replacing it with a fake replica to steal credit card data in real time. At least 49 merchants were compromised, with attackers leveraging a deprecated Stripe API to validate stolen cards invisibly. The breach exposed gaps in traditional defenses like CSP and X-Frame-Options, proving that modern attacks exploit blind spots around iframes rather than breaking them directly. The incident highlighted risks from third-party scripts (e.g., Google Tag Manager) running within payment iframes, creating massive security blind spots. The financial and reputational fallout included potential fraudulent transactions, customer distrust, and regulatory scrutiny under PCI DSS 4.0.1, which now mandates stricter monitoring of payment page integrity.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data BreachPayment FraudWeb SkimmingSupply Chain Attack
MOTIVATION
Financial Gain (Credit Card Theft and Fraud)
IMPACT
Credit Card NumbersPayment DataPersonally Identifiable Information (PII)Payment iframesHost PagesWordPress PlatformsThird-Party Scripts (e.g., Google Tag Manager)Operational Impact: Compromised Trust in Payment Processing, Increased Fraudulent TransactionsConversion Rate Impact: Potential Drop in Customer Trust and Checkout Completion RatesCustomer Complaints: Likely Increase (Undisclosed Quantity)Brand Reputation Impact: High (Erosion of Trust in Stripe and Affected Merchants)Legal Liabilities: Potential PCI DSS 4.0.1 Non-Compliance FinesIdentity Theft Risk: High (Stolen Credit Card Data)Payment Information Risk: Critical (Real-Time Validation of Stolen Cards)
DATA BREACH
Credit Card DataPayment InformationPotentially PIISensitivity Of Data: High (Financial and Personal Data)Data Exfiltration: Yes (Real-Time via Overlays, postMessage, CSS)Data Encryption: Bypassed (Legitimate iframe Encryption Undermined by Overlays)Personally Identifiable Information: Potential (Linked to Payment Data)
OCTOBER 2017
809Before Incident
Breach
25 Oct 2017Stripe
Stripe GEP, Inc.

Stripe GEP, Inc. Data Breach

747After Incident
CRITICAL-62
STR905072925
The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach at Stripe GEP, Inc. involving Legalinc Corporate Services, Inc. The breach, which occurred on October 25, 2017, and again on December 4, 2019, potentially affected approximately 2,670 individuals' personal information, including first and last names and Social Security numbers. The security vulnerability was discovered on December 11, 2019.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
first and last namesSocial Security numbers
DATA BREACH
first and last namesSocial Security numbersSensitivity Of Data: High

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Stripe ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Stripe's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Stripe ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Stripe's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?