Comparison Overview
Strategic Financial Group

Strategic Financial Group
Three Greenway Plaza, Suite 1500, Houston, TX, 77098, US
Last Update: 21/04/2026
Welcome to Strategic Financial Group, formally MassMutual Greater Houston. For 120 years, Strategic Financial Group and MassMutual have had the distinguished pleasure of serving clients’ financial needs. At SFG we are committed to providing an efficient and seamless com...

PT. Pegadaian
Jl. Kramat Raya 162, Jakarta Pusat, 10430, ID
Last Update: 13/09/2026
PT Pegadaian didirikan di kota Sukabumi, Jawa Barat pada 1 April 1901. Tak hanya bergerak di Industri Gadai, Pegadaian juga memiliki ragam produk dan layanan seperti investasi berbasis emas yang dapat dimiliki oleh masyarakat dengan cara yang mudah, diantaranya Tabunga...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Strategic Financial Group







PT. Pegadaian






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Strategic Financial Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for PT. Pegadaian in 2026.
Incident History - Strategic Financial Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Strategic Financial Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - PT. Pegadaian (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PT. Pegadaian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Strategic Financial Group

PT. Pegadaian
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.