Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

STMicroelectronicsSTMicroelectronics
VS
MediaTekMediaTek
STMicroelectronics

STMicroelectronics

39, Chemin du Champ des Filles, C. P. 21, Geneva, Switzerland, CH, CH 1228 Plan-Les-Ouates

Last Update: 06/07/2026

View Profile
812/1000Good

ST is a global semiconductor leader delivering intelligent and energy-efficient products and solutions that power the electronics at the heart of everyday life. ST’s products are found everywhere today, and together with our customers, we are enabling smarter driving an...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:34,873
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
MediaTek

MediaTek

No.1, Dusing Rd. 1, Hsin-Chu, 30078, TW

Last Update: 06/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.mediatek.com
834/1000Good

MediaTek Incorporated (TWSE: 2454) is a global fabless semiconductor company that enables nearly 2 billion connected devices a year. We are a market leader in developing innovative systems-on-chip (SoC) for mobile, home entertainment, connectivity and IoT products. Our ...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:14,187
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
STMicroelectronics

STMicroelectronics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MediaTek

MediaTek

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

STMicroelectronics has 11.11% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

MediaTek has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - STMicroelectronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STMicroelectronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MediaTek (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MediaTek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
STMicroelectronics

STMicroelectronics

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
NXPTHASTM1775572928
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ZERTHEESPSTMARD1783341911
MediaTek

MediaTek

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
TANKRANOTMEDCOI1773311566

FAQ

Between STMicroelectronics company and MediaTek company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and MediaTek company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and MediaTek company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and MediaTek company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and MediaTek company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and MediaTek company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and MediaTek company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and MediaTek company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and MediaTek company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and MediaTek company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and MediaTek company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between STMicroelectronics and MediaTek, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between STMicroelectronics and MediaTek, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - STMicroelectronics or MediaTek ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - STMicroelectronics or MediaTek ?
Between STMicroelectronics and MediaTek, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between STMicroelectronics and MediaTek, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1