Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

STMicroelectronicsSTMicroelectronics
VS
Infineon TechnologiesInfineon Technologies
STMicroelectronics

STMicroelectronics

39, Chemin du Champ des Filles, C. P. 21, Geneva, Switzerland, CH, CH 1228 Plan-Les-Ouates

Last Update: 06/07/2026

View Profile
812/1000Good

ST is a global semiconductor leader delivering intelligent and energy-efficient products and solutions that power the electronics at the heart of everyday life. ST’s products are found everywhere today, and together with our customers, we are enabling smarter driving an...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:34,873
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Infineon Technologies

Infineon Technologies

Am Campeon 1-12, Neubiberg, München, 85579, DE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.infineon.com
816/1000Good

Semiconductors are crucial to solve the energy challenges of our time and shape the digital transformation. This is why Infineon is committed to actively driving decarbonization and digitalization. As a global semiconductor leader in power systems and IoT, we enable gam...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:42,999
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
STMicroelectronics

STMicroelectronics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Infineon Technologies

Infineon Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

STMicroelectronics has 11.89% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Infineon Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - STMicroelectronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STMicroelectronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Infineon Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Infineon Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
STMicroelectronics

STMicroelectronics

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
NXPTHASTM1775572928
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ZERTHEESPSTMARD1783341911
Infineon Technologies

Infineon Technologies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between STMicroelectronics company and Infineon Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and Infineon Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and Infineon Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and Infineon Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and Infineon Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and Infineon Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and Infineon Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and Infineon Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and Infineon Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and Infineon Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between STMicroelectronics company and Infineon Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between STMicroelectronics and Infineon Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between STMicroelectronics and Infineon Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - STMicroelectronics or Infineon Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - STMicroelectronics or Infineon Technologies ?
Between STMicroelectronics and Infineon Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between STMicroelectronics and Infineon Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8