Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

St. Mary's Medical CenterSt. Mary's Medical Center
VS
UC San Diego HealthUC San Diego Health
St. Mary's Medical Center

St. Mary's Medical Center

201 NW R D Mize Rd, Blue Springs, US

Last Update: 25/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stmaryskc.com/
765/1000Fair

St. Mary's Medical Center has provided high-quality compassionate care to the residents of Blue Springs and Eastern Jackson County for more than 30 years. St. Mary's offers patients the best of both worlds--a warm, caring environment, close to home, providing the wide r...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:717
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UC San Diego Health

UC San Diego Health

200 West Arbor Drive, San Diego, CA, US, 92103

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

UC San Diego Health and Health Sciences has been caring for the community for almost 60 years. In 1966, we established our first medical center. Two years later, in 1968, UC San Diego School of Medicine opened for business. Today, UC San Diego Health is the only acade...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:10,692
Subsidiaries:56
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
St. Mary's Medical Center

St. Mary's Medical Center

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UC San Diego Health

UC San Diego Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Mary's Medical Center in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UC San Diego Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - St. Mary's Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Mary's Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UC San Diego Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UC San Diego Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
St. Mary's Medical Center

St. Mary's Medical Center

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UC San Diego Health

UC San Diego Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UCS108072625
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UCS1014070724
🔒 Incident : Breach
UCS1016090725

FAQ

Between St. Mary's Medical Center company and UC San Diego Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between St. Mary's Medical Center company and UC San Diego Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between St. Mary's Medical Center company and UC San Diego Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between St. Mary's Medical Center company and UC San Diego Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between St. Mary's Medical Center company and UC San Diego Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between St. Mary's Medical Center company and UC San Diego Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between St. Mary's Medical Center company and UC San Diego Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between St. Mary's Medical Center company and UC San Diego Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between St. Mary's Medical Center company and UC San Diego Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between St. Mary's Medical Center company and UC San Diego Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between St. Mary's Medical Center company and UC San Diego Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between St. Mary's Medical Center and UC San Diego Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between St. Mary's Medical Center and UC San Diego Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - St. Mary's Medical Center or UC San Diego Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - St. Mary's Medical Center or UC San Diego Health ?
Between St. Mary's Medical Center and UC San Diego Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between St. Mary's Medical Center and UC San Diego Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2