Comparison Overview
Sterling Risk Advisors, Inc.

Sterling Risk Advisors, Inc.
None, None, Atlanta, GA, US, 30339
Last Update: 11/05/2026
Since 2003, Sterling Risk Advisors continues to be one of the fastest growing privately held insurance brokerage firms in the Southeast. From our offices in Atlanta and Columbus Georgia, we have placed coverage in all 50 states through our extensive carrier representati...

Gallagher
2850 Golf Road, Rolling Meadows, 60008, US
Last Update: 07/10/2026
Gallagher, a global insurance brokerage, risk management, and consulting firm, serves communities around the globe, helping clients address risk, protecting assets, and recovering from losses. The products and services we provide keep businesses and institutions running...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Sterling Risk Advisors, Inc.







Gallagher






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sterling Risk Advisors, Inc. in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Gallagher in 2026.
Incident History - Sterling Risk Advisors, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sterling Risk Advisors, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Gallagher (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Gallagher cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Sterling Risk Advisors, Inc.

Gallagher
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.