Comparison Overview
Sterling Engineering
Sterling Engineering
Two Westbrook Corporate Center, Westchester, Illinois, 60154, US
Last Update: 05/03/2026
Sterling is an award-winning professional engineering consulting and technical staffing company. We provide client-focused specialty solutions across multiple industries: automation, food and beverage, life sciences, manufacturing, utilities, and renewable energy. Since...
Quest Global
7, Temasek Boulevard,, #09-04 Suntec Tower One,, Singapore, SG, 038987
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We are Quest Global. We’re in the business of engineering, but what we’re really building is a brighter future. It’s not just what we do, but why we do it that makes us different. We believe engineering has the unique opportunity to solve the problems of today that stan...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Sterling Engineering
Quest Global
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sterling Engineering in 2026.
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Quest Global has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Sterling Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sterling Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Quest Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Quest Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Sterling Engineering
Quest Global
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.