Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUPSTEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP
VS
CarrierCarrier
STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP

STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP

Europaallee 63, Frechen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, 50226, DE

Last Update: 20/02/2026

View Profile
747/1000Moderate

Steinzeug-Keramo, a company of the Wienerberger AG, is a solutions and system supplier for the water and wastewater industry. As a medium-sized company with many years of experience, we prove ourselves to our partners with our advanced expertise in the manufacture, lay...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:98
Subsidiaries:31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Carrier

Carrier

13995 Pasteur Blvd, Palm Beach Gardens, 33418, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.carrier.com
781/1000Fair

Carrier is a global leader in intelligent climate and energy solutions, pioneering sustainable innovations in climate technologies. Founded by Willis Carrier, the inventor of modern air conditioning, we have been shaping industries and enhancing lives for more than a ce...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:21,707
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP

STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Carrier

Carrier

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carrier in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Carrier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carrier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP

STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Carrier

Carrier

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP company and Carrier company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP company and Carrier company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP company and Carrier company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP company and Carrier company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP company and Carrier company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP company and Carrier company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP company and Carrier company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP company and Carrier company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP company and Carrier company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP company and Carrier company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP company and Carrier company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP and Carrier, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP and Carrier, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP or Carrier ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP or Carrier ?
Between STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP and Carrier, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between STEINZEUG-KERAMO GROUP and Carrier, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA