Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Steinhoff InternationalSteinhoff International
VS
CoopCoop
Steinhoff International

Steinhoff International

Block D, De Wagenweg Office Park, Stellenbosh, Western Cape, 7600, ZA

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
770/1000Fair

Steinhoff is a global retailer that offers a wide range of household goods and general merchandise in Europe, Australasia, the United States and Africa. From big box destination stores and store-in-store concepts to focused speciality stores, Steinhoff’s goal is to mak...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:282
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Coop

Coop

Thiersteinerallee 14, Basel, 4002, CH

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile

Coop has been an integral part of Switzerland for over 150 years and acts with a sense of responsibility for its people, its regions and its ecosystems. As a retailer, wholesaler and producer, we deliver quality and are proud of our numerous brands and products. The div...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:23,916
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Steinhoff International

Steinhoff International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Coop

Coop

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Steinhoff International in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coop in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Steinhoff International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Steinhoff International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Coop (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coop cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Steinhoff International

Steinhoff International

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Coop

Coop

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Steinhoff International company and Coop company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Steinhoff International company and Coop company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Steinhoff International company and Coop company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Steinhoff International company and Coop company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Steinhoff International company and Coop company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Steinhoff International company and Coop company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Steinhoff International company and Coop company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Steinhoff International company and Coop company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Steinhoff International company and Coop company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Steinhoff International company and Coop company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Steinhoff International company and Coop company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Steinhoff International and Coop, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Steinhoff International and Coop, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Steinhoff International or Coop ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Steinhoff International or Coop ?
Between Steinhoff International and Coop, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Steinhoff International and Coop, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8